News & Events

News & Events

News

January 2016

Burke is pleased to announce that Cheryl L. Johnson-Hartwell has become an owner of the firm.

Ms. Johnson-Hartwell became an owner of the firm effective January 1, 2016.

July 21, 2015

A LIFE WELL LIVED

Burke’s attorneys and staff mourn the recent passing of former long-time partner, owner, of counsel, and friend, Carl K. Newton. We extend our deepest condolences to his family and loved ones.

July 17, 2015

BURKE PARTNER RONALD FRANK APPOINTED TO LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

Congratulations to Burke partner Ronald F. Frank who was appointed to a judgeship in the Los Angeles County Superior Court by Governor Brown on July 16, 2015.  Ron joined Burke as a partner in 2008 serving as chair of the firm’s Litigation Practice Group. 

June 15, 2015

Developers Can Be Required to Include Affordable Housing, California High Court Rules

The Los Angeles Times, by Maura Dolan

In a case in which Burke partner Thomas Brown wrote a friend of the court brief on behalf of the League of California Cities and the California State Association of Counties, the California Supreme Court has issued a landmark decision that is a major victory for California cities seeking to address what the State legislature has repeatedly called a housing crisis. In the case, entitled California Building Industry Association v. City of San Jose, a building trade association (CBIA) challenged the facial validity of San Jose’s “inclusionary zoning” ordinance, which requires developers of market rate housing to set aside 15% of a project’s units at prices affordable to low and moderate income purchasers, as an unconstitutional “taking” of property. In making its claim, CBIA argued the ordinance constituted an “exaction” whose validity was required to be reviewed by courts under a rigorous “heightened scrutiny.”  Affirming a Court of Appeal ruling in favor of San Jose, and instead accepting the arguments presented by the League and others, the Supreme Court disagreed with the CBIA, ruling that San Jose’s inclusionary ordinance was a form of land use regulation, not an exaction, and that as such it was entitled to the most deferential standard of judicial review applicable to elected City Councils’ legislative policy judgments about appropriate land uses.