Pursuant to a California Court of Appeal decision issued last week—Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, 2025 WL 2116363, decided on remand from the Supreme Court—a local government may refute a Nollan/Dolan takings claim alleging that impact fees imposed as a condition of project approval, pursuant to a previously adopted fee schedule for classes of projects, by relying on a nexus study that had been prepared for adoption of the applicable fee schedule.

Pursuant to a California Court of Appeal decision issued last week—Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, 2025 WL 2116363, decided on remand from the Supreme Court—a local government may refute a Nollan/Dolan takings claim alleging that impact fees imposed as a condition of project approval, pursuant to a previously adopted fee schedule for classes of projects, by relying on a nexus study that had been prepared for adoption of the applicable fee schedule.

Page Not Found

Sorry, no posts matched your criteria.