Maxwell A. Blum

TOTALNUM Results

People ( Results)

Michael Y. Hsueh

Michael Yung-Huan Hsueh is an associate in the firm’s Silicon Valley office and is a member of Burke’s Litigation Practice Group. Michael has represented clients in litigation in both federal and state courts in disputes involving employment, intellectual property, real estate, contracts, and business torts. He also has substantial experience in all phases of civil litigation, including discovery, law and motion practice, settlement negotiations, and trial preparation. Prior to joining Burke, Michael worked at a prominent boutique law firm in the Bay Area where he represented individuals and companies in arbitration and in state and federal courts. Michael earned his J.D. from Cornell Law School and his undergraduate degree (B.S., Human Biology) from the University of California, San Diego. Michael is active in the local community and has been a guest lecturer for the Workers’ Rights Clinic and a mock trial coach for Saratoga High School.

Eric S. Phillips

Eric Phillips practices in the areas of land use, real estate, and CEQA compliance. Eric represents clients in all phases of the development process, including property acquisition, entitlement and administrative approvals, CEQA compliance, compliance with state housing laws, and negotiating real estate disputes. Eric has particular experience with State Density Bonus Law, the Housing Accountability Act, SB 35, and Housing Element Law. Eric assists private clients to successfully obtain subdivision maps, density bonuses, development agreements, and other land use approvals. He also has served as special counsel to numerous public agencies and provides advice on writing ordinances and legislative findings related to zoning, subdivisions, inclusionary housing programs, rent control and tenant protection measures, and impact fees. In both roles, Eric has worked with various clients to negotiate and close purchase and sale agreements, draft loan agreements, create below-market-rate rental and for-sale programs, perform property diligence, craft residential preference programs, and work with technical consultants to prepare Draft and Final EIRs.

Joanne Madden

Joanne Madden’s practice focuses on litigation involving commercial disputes, corporate governance, and employment matters. She represents companies involved in disputes concerning lease obligations, online service agreements, trade secrets, risk allocation between suppliers, and employment contracts. She also has extensive experience representing transportation and construction companies in general liability matters. Her clients include individuals, non- profits, small to mid-size businesses, as well as Fortune 500 companies. While primarily a litigator, she also advises clients on risk management in various settings. She has counseled individuals, corporations, and public entities concerning compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, California’s Unruh Act, Wage and Hour regulations, OSHA, Motor Carrier regulations, environmental regulations such as California’s Proposition 65, and consumer protection laws. Joanne also counsels a national product distributor on claim and litigation management. She appears in federal and state courts, arbitrations, administrative hearings as well as before special masters. Joanne serves as Judge Pro Tem for the San Francisco Superior Court, mediating landlord tenant disputes and sitting as a small claims judge.

Bernard Gehlhar

Bernard Gehlhar focuses his practice on the representation of consumer product companies, defending them in products liability litigation, advising on regulatory and corporate issues, and assisting with contractual matters. Bernard also has extensive experience dealing with other types of products, including industrial products. Bernard works closely with clients to gain an understanding of their business model and objectives in order to provide practical guidance on day-to-day business decisions in the context of legal risk. In addition to his litigation and litigation management roles, Bernard is a trusted advisor to clients in various related areas, including product safety and regulatory compliance. He routinely assists clients with Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) compliance and reporting; product recalls, and in reviewing product manuals, safety warnings, labels, and other collateral materials. Bernard assists clients with negotiating and drafting contracts, including licensing and vendor agreements. Bernard also has significant experience counseling clients with respect to advertising and promotional activities, including sweepstakes and contests. Bernard has experience with a broad range of civil litigation matters, including class actions and other complex cases. In addition to products liability cases, Bernard has handled commercial disputes and defended professional liability matters on behalf of mortgage brokers, insurance agents and brokers, third-party administrators, investment advisors, securities broker-dealers and attorneys, among others. He also has litigated business torts and defended claims of breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, and vicarious liability for the acts of employees and agents. Bernard handles cases in state and federal trial courts and in various arbitration forums and has extensive experience with appellate proceedings. He has drafted countless briefs and argued before the California Courts of Appeal and Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in matters involving a range of substantive areas, including professional liability, products liability, general liability, business torts, and ERISA.

Christian P. Fonss

Christian P. Fonss is a partner in Burke’s San Diego office. Prior to joining Burke, Chris was a shareholder and co-chair of the corporate, transactional and securities practice of a regional law firm headquartered in San Diego. Chris also previously practiced corporate and securities law with a national law firm in its Washington, DC and San Diego offices, and founded his own boutique law practice. Chris focuses his practice on corporate and securities law, including mergers and acquisitions, securities offerings and compliance, corporate governance, leasing, general corporate matters and business counseling, and the drafting and negotiation of all types of contracts and corporate documents. Chris’ practice includes counseling a wide variety of clients ranging from entrepreneurs starting their first business to large public and private companies. He has extensive experience advising business entities in connection with mergers & acquisitions, raising of capital, securities law compliance, contractual matters, and corporate formation. Chris has negotiated complex merger and acquisition transactions, leases and a variety of corporate and commercial agreements on behalf of his clients, including manufacturing and supply agreements. He also assists clients with respect to corporate governance matters and in complying with the state and federal securities laws. In the legal community, Chris is a member of the San Diego County Bar Association and the Business Law Section of the American Bar Association (ABA). He is a member of the ABA’s Committees on Mergers & Acquisitions, Middle Market and Small Business, Private Equity and Venture Capital and State Regulation of Securities.

Mariel I. Estigarribia

Mariel Estigarribia has experience in representing privately held companies of all sizes as well as publicly-traded companies in the merger and acquisition of other entities and assets in addition to corporate formation; drafting, reviewing and negotiating commercial agreements and leases; representing issuers and investors in transactions involving raising of capital; advising corporate clients with respect to all aspects of government contracts and special certifications; representing buyers and sellers in real property transactions; assisting clients with Securities Exchange Act compliance and public company reporting; advising clients with respect to corporate governance matters as well as general business counseling.

In addition, Mariel has also worked on cross-border transactions specifically with Latin American and South American entities.

Prior to joining Burke, Mariel honed her business skills as an analyst at a boutique investment banking firm in New York City, where she mainly focused on mergers and acquisitions, restructuring and bankruptcy matters. Mariel then practiced corporate law at a prominent national law firm in Detroit, Washington, D.C. and San Diego, handling a vast array of complex transactions, including mergers & acquisitions, equity and debt financings and securities compliance matters.

Mariel’s fluency in Spanish, her thorough understanding of financial data and her comprehensive legal experience, has well-positioned her to advise corporate clients, including those dealing with cross-border matters.

Ashley N. Fasano

Ashley N. Fasano is an associate in Burke Williams & Sorensen’s San Diego office. Ashley’s areas of practice include labor and employment, general liability matters, and representation of automobile and recreational vehicle dealerships. Prior to joining Burke, Ashley’s practice focused on consumer protection and advocacy where she gained substantial experience in all phases of civil litigation, including written and expert discovery, depositions, settlement negotiations, trial preparation, and trial. Originally from Manalapan, New Jersey, Ashley graduated from the Pennsylvania State University in 2013 with a B.S. in Hotel, Restaurant and Institutional Management. Ashley earned her J.D. from the University of San Diego School of Law with concentrations in Employment and Labor Law and Public Interest Law. During law school, Ashley served as a legal extern for the Attorney General’s Office, Employment and Administrative Mandate Section in San Diego. Ashley was a member of the Phi Delta Phi International Legal Honor Society and received academic honors for her Employment Law and Technology coursework.

Michelle T. Harrington

Michelle’s practice involves representing employers in all aspects of labor and employment litigation, including wrongful termination, retaliation, harassment, discrimination, family/medical leave violation, breach of contract, and wage and hour violations in individual plaintiff matters as well as in class and representative actions typically involving the California Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). Michelle has advised employers on all aspects of employment law, including hiring, discipline, termination, classification of employees as exempt or non-exempt, independent contractor status, rest and meal breaks, employee privacy, drug testing, reductions in force, disability and religious accommodations, and leaves of absence. She has reviewed and prepared employee handbooks, severance agreements, executive contracts, and independent contractor agreements. She has conducted employment due diligence in mergers and acquisitions. Michelle has represented a wide range of employers including family-owned businesses, colleges, national retailers, and international businesses. She has obtained defense verdicts in jury trials in her areas of practice and has mediated in excess of 100 cases.

While attending law school, Michelle was the recipient of the American Jurisprudence Award in Trial Practice and the Academic Achievement Award. She was also the recipient of the Dean’s Merit Scholarship, which paid for her tuition. Throughout law school, she volunteered with the San Diego Volunteer Lawyer Program to provide assistance to the indigent.

John Yang

John Yang focuses his practice on intellectual property law, including patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade dress, and trade secrets. His experience includes chemical, optical, electrical, and semiconductor devices. John is well-versed in drafting, reviewing, and negotiating a variety of licenses and agreements, including master services agreements, common-interest agreements, patent cross-licenses, indemnity agreements, and non-disclosure agreements. Additionally, John has conducted patent clearances and can provide non-infringement and freedom-to-operate opinions, as well as business-oriented advice for developing, implementing, and aligning intellectual property strategy with business objectives. John also helps clients with strategic trademark counseling and protection, and has prosecuted hundreds of US applications and trademarks in the US Trademark Office. He has helped clients manage their trademark portfolios to maximize identity and brand in the marketplace. Prior to returning to private practice, John was Senior Director of IP at a consumer products manufacturer. Before entering the legal profession, John graduated from Berkeley and Stanford and was an engineer in the semiconductor industry for nearly 10 years with Intel Corporation and TriQuint Semiconductor (now Qorvo). Leveraging his skills and former in-house counsel knowledge, John is a dedicated and trusted business and legal advisor that implements the most practical and cost-efficient solution for his clients, allowing them to focus on growing and developing their businesses.

Charles C. Yang

*Licensed in Texas, not licensed in California. Charles Yang focuses his practice on patent prosecution, counseling, and dispute resolution. Leveraging his comprehensive experience and expertise in all aspects of patent law, Charles regularly provides strategic advice tailored to achieve the unique business objectives of his clients. As a registered patent attorney with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, he has developed and managed patent portfolios for clients in various industries, including optics, semiconductor, medical devices, construction, telecommunication, and consumer products. Charles has prepared and prosecuted patent applications in the U.S. and internationally, conducted freedom-to-operate studies, rendered opinions, and performed IP due diligence. Charles teams up with highly experienced trial litigators at Burke to resolve patent disputes in various patent venues, including district courts, the International Trade Commission (“ITC”), and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”). Additionally, Charles has significant cross-border dispute resolution experience, with particular emphasis on China. Charles uses his understanding of China’s patent law, court system, and trial procedures to help clients navigate pitfalls faced by many U.S. litigants, including cultural and language barriers, limited discovery, and potential bias.

Patricia L. Peden

Patricia Peden is a seasoned trial attorney and member of Burke's Intellectual Property Practice Group. Her practice focuses on litigating patent infringement cases, trade secret litigation, and other complex commercial litigation. In addition to bringing to the table a deep knowledge of substantive legal doctrines, Patricia offers clients solid business judgment and an unwavering commitment to client service. Patricia understands cases are won by hard work, creative thinking and mastery of the law and facts. She litigates with an eye toward trial, allowing her to make cost-benefit judgment calls during discovery based on what is truly needed for a successful result. Patricia maximizes early case planning to ensure litigation costs are proportional to case value. And she understands the importance of teamwork and communication. She strives to provide her clients with clear, concrete solutions to complex legal problems. Patricia has extensive federal court experience. She clerked for two federal judges, the Honorable David Folsom in the Eastern District of Texas and the Honorable Richard C. Tallman at the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. She has litigated disputes ranging from large, complex cases with multi-million-dollar damage claims to smaller suits between private parties. Her patent infringement cases have involved a wide range of technologies, including cellular telephony, recombinant human erythropoietin, LED technology, Wi-Fi, various chipsets, software and business methods, to name a few. She has litigated non-compete agreements and trade secret disputes. She has substantial experience litigating cases in the Eastern District of Texas, the Northern District of California, and other magnet venues for intellectual property disputes. Patricia has considerable experience with complex commercial cases involving trade secrets and non-compete agreements, copyright, trademark, antitrust, fraud, breach of contract, business torts, and defamation. Patricia also maintains an active appellate practice.

Eli J. Flushman

Eli Flushman is a public law associate in Burke’s Marin County office. Eli is a skilled municipal law attorney who has great experience advising cities on general municipal law, including, drafting ordinances, advising staff on land use and development, code enforcement, public nuisance litigation, and general litigation. Eli’s code enforcement practice centers on working with cities to abate properties with nuisance conditions utilizing administrative enforcement, civil litigation, receiverships, demolitions, inspection and abatement warrants, and voluntary compliance. He also has experience conducting criminal prosecutions for municipal code violations, and opposing Pitchess motions. Eli is a graduate of the University of San Francisco School of Law. At USF, Eli was the President of the Jewish Law Student Association and a member of the USF Trial Team. Eli received his undergraduate degree from UC Berkeley, where he spent a year with the baseball team. Prior to his employment with Burke, Eli worked for the City of Vallejo, where he built up and led the Neighborhood Law Program, a successful campaign utilizing legal processes to drastically improve the quality of life for citizens of Vallejo. Eli spent over six years in Vallejo, where the Neighborhood Law Program was involved in over 25 Receivership cases, and 20 public nuisance lawsuits, turning over severely dilapidated and nuisance properties and helping to create an environment that made Solano County one of the top real estate markets in the country. Prior to his work with the City of Vallejo, Eli has worked in the City Attorney's Office in Redwood City and in Berkeley, and as a Staff Attorney for the League of California Cities.

Robert W. Dickerson, Jr.

Robert Dickerson, Jr., Chair of Burke’s IP Practice Group, has been litigating patent, antitrust, trademark, copyright, and trade secret cases for over 30 years, most of those as first chair, and many of those for Fortune 500 companies. He has litigated cases in many U.S. District Courts throughout the country, before the International Trade Commission, and in the United States Patent and Trademark Office, compiling an exceptional win-to-loss ratio. He has also successfully argued cases before various appellate courts, including the Federal Circuit, and has been retained to lead and consult on litigation in other countries. Robert's experience involves a wide range of technologies, including various types of medical devices, optical networks, 3-D printing, flashlights, laser sintering, stereolithography, biotechnology (including genetically modified plants), integrated chip design, medical diagnostic methods and devices, veterinary products, commercial garment processing, laminated flooring panels, computer switch products, non-volatile memory, business methods, video and other games, database management, data encryption and securitization, and mechanical devices, among many others. In addition, he is registered to practice patent law by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, oversees patent and trademark prosecution matters, and advises clients on their overall IP portfolios, including national and global IP strategies and licensing programs for patents and trademarks. He has also successfully asserted copyright infringement cases, obtaining large settlements for his clients. In addition, Robert litigates general business and franchise matters in state courts and before administrative agencies. He has represented a national distributor of motor vehicles and handled a wide variety of motor vehicle distributor/dealer issues and litigation throughout the country. Robert also counsels clients on all IP aspects of transactional matters (including M&A) and provides infringement and freedom-to-operate analysis and opinions. He has directed the development and implementation of IP audit, capture, evaluation, and monetization programs for companies engaged in research and development. Robert has twice been named as one of the Top 75 IP attorneys and one of the Top 30 Patent Litigators in California by California Daily Journal on the basis of results obtained in large-stakes patent litigation. He has been named as a Tier 1 Patent litigator and as a California Highly Recommended Litigation Star by Benchmark Plaintiff, an IP Superstar by Los Angeles Magazine for each of the last 15 years, and has been recognized in several Who's Who listings of IP attorneys. Robert has often been quoted in major publications, including the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal, on hot topics and current cases in IP law, and has published articles in the ABA Journal and other legal publications. Robert was lead counsel in a pro bono matter that resulted in the largest judgment ever obtained in a Public Counsel pro bono consumer fraud case, for which he received the "California Angel" award from California Magazine. Robert started his career at IP powerhouse Lyon & Lyon, where he was Associate, then Partner, and then the first ever Managing Partner of the firm, and he has also been Chair and Co-Chair of the IP Groups of large national and international law firms. In law school, Robert was a member of Moot Court Honors Program and on the intercollegiate team competing in the Giles Sutherland Rich Patent Law National Competition (Winner, Regional Finals), a member of Law Review, and winner of the Jurisprudence Award in Property. Prior to starting law school, Robert worked as a cowboy on a cattle ranch, paid for his undergraduate education by playing lead guitar in a professional rock n' roll band, and worked for Shell Development Corporation involved in research and development of herbicides and pesticides. “Success is 10 percent inspiration and 90 percent perspiration.” (Thomas Alva Edison). “Very few things are ever as good or bad as they seem at the moment, so don’t overreact to either.” (Author Unknown).

Victoria H. Shin

Victoria Shin is a litigator with substantial experience in all phases of civil litigation, including written discovery, depositions, law and motion practice settlement negotiations and trial. She has represented both public and private employers in all aspects of labor and employment litigation. She has defended public employers against whistleblower actions for retaliation in violation of the California Labor Code §1102.5, wrongful termination, harassment, discrimination, and failure to provide reasonable accommodation. Victoria has also mediated a PAGA (Private Attorneys General Act) action for a corporation against aggrieved employees concerning civil penalties associated with wage and hour claims, meal and rest breaks, overtime, and adequate record-keeping. In addition to wage and hour litigation, she has also defended employers against single plaintiff complaints regarding wrongful termination, discrimination and harassment litigation, unfair labor practice disputes and has conducted workplace investigations. As second chair for three trials defending a school district, Victoria was involved in all aspects of trial preparation and also direct examined percipient witnesses, cross-examined the plaintiff and took the deposition of plaintiff’s expert. She obtained favorable results for all her trials. Victoria also won an arbitration between a city and the local firefighter union regarding the city’s obligation to contribute towards the CalPERS retirement plans of classic versus new members. She is committed to aggressively advocating and vindicating the rights of her clients. During law school, Victoria was a Board Agent for the National Labor Relations Board Region 32 in Oakland. She investigated unfair labor practice charges and potential violations of Weingarten rights by employers, took sworn affidavits from charging and charged party witnesses and prepared written reports and oral presentations to make recommendations to the Regional Director and Regional Attorney.

Marvin C. Cho

Marvin Cho is an associate in Burke, Williams & Sorensen's Los Angeles office and is a member of the firm’s Labor and Employment Law practice group. He represents public and private employers in civil actions filed in state and federal court. Prior to joining Burke, Marvin worked at a prominent plaintiff’s employment law firm where he gained significant experience litigating claims for discrimination, retaliation, and harassment under the Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”), wrongful termination claims, whistleblower actions, violations of California wage and hour law, and representative actions under the Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”). Thereafter, Marvin joined a public entity defense firm where he defended civil lawsuits filed against municipalities including high-profile employment litigation alleging violations of the FEHA, civil rights cases against local law enforcement arising under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, and personal injury actions. Marvin has substantial experience in all phases of civil litigation including engaging in motion practice, drafting appellate briefs, appearing in court for oral argument, taking depositions, handling all aspects of discovery, preparing mediation briefs, negotiating settlements, and preparing for trial. In 2010, Marvin graduated magna cum laude from UCLA with a B.A. in Psychology. He earned his J.D. in 2014 from UC Davis School of Law where he was an editor of the UC Davis Law Review and graduated Order of the Coif. During law school, Marvin served as a judicial extern to the Honorable James V. Selna of the United States District Court, Central District of California. After law school, and prior to entering private practice, he served as a law clerk for all three Justices of the Supreme Court of Guam.

Susan K. Chelsea

Susan Chelsea has over three decades of employment law, business and commercial litigation, automobile dealership representation, construction law, and government contract claims experience. Susan’s practice primarily focuses on employment law, but over the past 30 years she has handled matters involving general business litigation, contract disputes, construction contract disputes, consumer claims, government contract claims, mechanic’s lien and stop notice claims, and general liability defense. Susan’s employment practice includes both counseling and litigation work. She drafts and updates employee handbooks, other employer policies and procedures, employment agreements, severance agreements, nondisclosure agreements, commission agreements, pay plans, and anti-harassment policies. Her employment counseling practice includes wage and hour compliance, hiring and firing, and FMLA, CFRA, and ADA compliance. Susan conducts workplace investigations as an independent investigator. She also counsels employers through the investigation process when the investigation is handled in-house or by an independent third party investigator. An experienced litigator, Susan has successfully tried and arbitrated cases involving wrongful termination, retaliation, wage and hour, trade secrets, and unfair competition as well as real estate issues, business disputes, construction disputes, securities transactions and products liability. Susan has defended employers in over 40 wage claims before the California Labor Commissioner. She has also successfully defended employers subject to Labor Commissioner citations, eliminating or substantially reducing civil penalties assessed against employers. Susan has also successfully defended businesses against OSHA citations, including obtaining dismissal of citations after a successful appeal and hearing. Finally, Susan has defended businesses against ADA claims, both in the employment context and related to accessibility issues. Susan frequently presents on topics related to employment law and provides training to employers on various topics including anti-harassment and bullying, how to conduct proper workplace investigations, and compliance with updated laws and regulations. A leader in the legal community, Susan served as Chair of USLAW Network’s Employment & Labor Law Practice Group. Susan was a faculty member of the University of San Diego Lawyer’s Assistant Program for nine years. She served on the Executive Committee of the State Bar Real Property Law Section and was the Co-Chair of the Litigation Subsection of the State Bar Real Property Law Section. She also served as Co-Chair of the San Diego County Bar Association Construction Law Section, and a barrister with the Inns of Court, Wallace Inn.

Mark H. Nys

Mark Nys represents automobile and recreational vehicle dealerships (single point, independent and automobile dealership groups) and automobile and recreational vehicle manufacturers, direct and indirect lenders, flooring lenders, automobile service centers and surety bonding companies in litigation involving catastrophic loss, negligence, fraud, product liability, warranty, lemon law and auto financing disputes throughout California. He has had extensive experience representing clients in franchise disputes between dealers and between dealers and manufacturers of automobiles and recreational vehicles. In the construction industry, Mark represents owners, developers, general contractors, subcontractors and design professionals in both residential and commercial construction, construction defect, workplace injuries and complex construction transactional matters. He provides guidance in both public and private works projects, counseling clients on construction financing, mechanics’ liens, stop notices, and enforcement actions. Mark also regularly represents sureties in claims against contractor license bonds. Mark also regularly defends mobile home parks and homeowners’ associations from liability arising from resident litigation. Licensed before the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Mark is also experienced in litigating intellectual property disputes. In addition to appropriate court admissions, Mark is a licensed California real estate broker and serves as a trusted legal advisor to credit unions and other financial institutions in real estate transactions, credit union operations and lender liability litigation. Originally from Santa Maria, California, Mark graduated from Claremont McKenna College in 1985 with a B.A. in Chemistry. Graduating Phi Beta Kappa, Mark was a 4-time NCAA All-American in both singles and doubles tennis. He then attended the University of California at Irvine, where he received his Graduate Certificate in Hazardous Materials Management before moving on to California Western School of Law and earning his Juris Doctorate in 1997. Mark retired after twenty years of service as a Surface Warfare Officer in the United States Navy with the rank of Commander.

Paul E. McGowan

*Licensed in Georgia and Virginia, not licensed in California. Paul McGowan has extensive experience in commercial litigation and corporate counseling, along with a multi-year federal clerkship in the Eastern District of Virginia and a significant technical background from NASA. His practice encompasses all aspects of intellectual property law, including infringement and enforcement activities for global companies in high-stakes patent, trademark and copyright litigation in trial and appellate courts nationwide and across a range of industries. Paul is a senior litigator with deep experience in litigation and arbitration/mediation of intellectual property and commercial disputes and in patent reexaminations and appeals before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. He is well versed in the various patent examination proceedings available under the America Invents Act, having served as lead counsel in over 20 post-grant proceedings, including representation of petitioners and patent owners, and in related multi-district patent infringement litigation. Paul’s representative patent litigation experience includes cases involving pharmaceuticals, smartphone mobile banking apps, cellular phone technologies, silicon microphones, video editing algorithms, medical and biomedical devices, consumer electronics, chemical extrusion, semiconductors, USB flash memory, manufacturing equipment, business methods, sporting goods and clothing apparel. A registered patent attorney, Paul has also prepared/prosecuted patents in the mechanical and electromechanical arts for Fortune 500 clients with foreign and domestic interests including semiconductor manufacturers, power companies and a major bowling products manufacturer. Paul has over a dozen years of experience as a practicing engineer at the NASA Langley Research Center, in Hampton, Virginia, where he was an internationally recognized senior researcher and project leader with over 20 technical publications and presentations at national and international conferences. Most notably, Paul led an award-winning project team that successfully developed a landmark national test bed and ground test technologies for the International Space Station.

Meghan Canty Murphey

Meghan Canty Murphey practices insolvency law, business litigation, and intellectual property litigation. Meghan has extensive experience at all stages of litigation, including trials, in both state and federal courts. Meghan primarily represents the interests of financial institutions, creditors, buyers, sellers, and landlords, in a variety of litigation and bankruptcy proceedings and in connection with collateral foreclosures, evictions, collections, loan workouts, and loan documentation. She specializes in creditors’ rights and has worked successfully to obtain favorable results for lenders both in and out of court. Meghan has handled a variety of cases, including contract disputes, real estate litigation, mechanics’ lien and stop notice claims, unlawful detainer actions, cases alleging lender liability and sham guaranty defenses, creditor suits, collection actions, and bankruptcy disputes. Meghan’s bankruptcy court experience includes representation of creditors in contested confirmation, valuation, asset sale, and relief from stay proceedings, as well as adversary proceedings, including objection to discharge, non-dischargeability, and fraudulent transfer actions. Meghan also specializes in business and intellectual property disputes. She regularly litigates trademarks, trade dress, copyrights, and patents, both seeking enforcement of those rights and defending against claims of infringement. Meghan also litigates claims for misappropriation of trade secrets, unfair business practices, interference with business relations, and breach of contract. Meghan also has extensive appellate experience, representing clients in front of the Ninth Circuit and Federal Circuit and in various California state courts of appeal. She has obtained favorable results for her clients on appeal, including in two cases that resulted in published, precedential opinions: (1) Zachary v. California Bank & Trust, 811 F.3d 1191 (9th Cir. 2016); and (2) Internet Patents Corp. v. Active Network, Inc., 790 F.3d 1343 (Fed. Cir. 2015).

Matthew D. Murphey

Matthew Murphey is a trial attorney. From the start of his legal career as a courts martial clerk in the United States Army in 1985, Matt has worked in courtrooms. As counsel, Matt has tried cases to juries in three different states and five different federal districts. Matt’s background in science coupled with his trial experience with prosecution agencies allowed him to transfer his trial skills to private practice fifteen years ago to complex patent and other intellectual property, financial institutions, and commercial litigation cases.

Matt has argued cases before the Federal Circuit and Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, state trial and appellate courts throughout California, Washington, Arizona, and Texas, as well as federal district courts in California, Washington, Arizona, Oregon, Texas, New York, Wisconsin, and Florida.

Matt is qualified as an expert witness in standard of care for patent litigation, patent law trials, trials in federal courts, the Rules of Professional Conduct as it relates to litigation generally and for reasonableness of attorneys’ fees incurred in litigation. He has testified as an expert witness before a jury, and has given expert opinions in this capacity for both plaintiff and defendant litigants.

Matt provides pro bono representation for indigent veterans of the United States Armed Forces in civil litigation and Veterans Administration and Department of Defense matters.

Matt has represented financial institutions and major corporations in jury and bench trials involving guaranty, surety, and all types of litigation matters, including workouts, foreclosures, bankruptcy and purchase and sale disputes. He regularly defends financial institutions against claims of lender liability.

Matt's intellectual property litigation practice focuses on a particular expertise in patent cases involving a range of technologies. These include chemical and molecular biology disciplines related to the biotechnology industry, including polymerase chain reaction ("PCR") DNA/RNA isolation assays, gas and liquid chromatography, mass spectroscopy, and in vitro diagnostics ("IVD"). He has also litigated mechanical and electrical/electronic engineering patents related to the diving, sporting goods, food service, computer and mass media technology industries. Matt is an elected member of the Jurisprudence Section of the American Academy of Forensic Science.

Matt also maintains an active trademark, trade dress and copyright litigation practice related to the retail apparel, food service and manufacturing industries. These include matters pending before district courts, the United States Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, and numerous alternative dispute resolution ("ADR") tribunals.

Michael A. Slater

Michael Slater is an associate attorney in Burke, Williams & Sorensen’s public law and litigation practice groups. Michael’s practice areas include government tort liability, civil rights, constitutional law, personal injury and wrongful death. Prior to joining Burke, Michael defended complex tort actions in both state and federal courts. Michael has substantial civil litigation experience, including pleadings, law and motion, discovery, alternative dispute resolution and enforcement of judgments. Michael earned his J.D. from the University of California, Hastings College of the Law. As a law student, Michael served as a Judicial Extern for Federal Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore, United States District Court for the Northern District of California (Oakland). Michael was also a member of Hastings’ National Moot Court Competition team, Moot Court Executive Board, and Pro Bono Society for the Class of 2017.

Gina N. Giovacchini

Gina N. Giovacchini is an associate in Burke, Williams & Sorensen’s Los Angeles office. Gina’s areas of practice include public entity defense, premises liability, dangerous condition of public property, and tort litigation. Gina is a member of the firm’s Public Law and Litigation practice groups. Prior to joining Burke, Gina defended clients against a variety claims including product and premises liability, breach of contract, construction defect, catastrophic injury, wrongful death, class-actions, and complex tort litigation. Gina earned her Juris Doctor degree from Loyola Law School, Los Angeles and was admitted to the Bar of the State of California in 2016. She graduated with concentrations in Criminal Justice and Public Interest Law and was a member of the Center for Juvenile Law and Policy. Gina also clerked for the Capital Habeas Unit for the Oﬃce of the Federal Public Defender of the Central District of California, the Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles, the American Civil Liberties Union, and the Honorable Julia W. Brand of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Central District of California. Gina earned her B.A. from the University of California, Santa Barbara.

Gregory B. Thomas

Gregory Thomas is a partner at Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP who litigates complex cases in the following areas: government tort liability, civil rights, constitutional law, jail conditions of confinement, wrongful arrest, excessive force, catastrophic personal injury and wrongful death, products liability, writs and appeals, moving and storage claims and professional liability. Greg has focused on litigation since becoming a member of the State Bar of California in 2005. He is admitted to practice before all the courts of the State of California, all United States District Courts in California and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Greg has extensive experience in all phases of civil litigation from pre-litigation negotiations to pleadings, law and motion, discovery, alternative dispute resolution, jury trials to verdict, writs and appeals, and enforcement of judgments and settlements. During law school, Greg served as a Judicial Extern for Justice Patricia D. Benke, California Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division One and for Judge J. Richard Haden (Ret.), Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. He was also a member of the University of San Diego’s National Moot Court Team and Moot Court Executive Board. From 1997 to 2002, Greg served as an officer in the United States Navy aboard surface combatant ships actively deployed to areas ranging from the Persian Gulf to the Sea of Japan.

Temitayo (“Ope”) Peters

Temitayo (“Ope”) Peters is an associate in the firm’s Oakland office. A member of the firm’s Public Law Practice Group, Ope provides legal representation for cities and other public entities. Prior to joining the firm, Ope defended public officials and governmental entities in civil rights litigation. She has also worked in various legal capacities for several human rights-focused non-governmental agencies and foreign governments worldwide, and in Washington, D.C. for a prominent lobbying firm. As a student at Pepperdine University School of Law, Ope earned certificates in International & Comparative Law and Dispute Resolution. She also participated in a mediation clinic where she facilitated the settlement of numerous small claims cases, was a member of the moot court board, and spent two respective semesters studying in Washington, DC and London, England.

Sally Trung Nguyen

Sally Trung Nguyen is a Senior Associate in the firm’s Silicon Valley office and is a member of Burke’s Labor and Employment Practice Group. She is experienced in handling a wide-range of labor and employment disputes, including wage and hour compliance (individual and collective actions), employment discrimination, harassment, retaliation, FMLA/CFRA, and disability accommodations. Sally has devoted her legal career to helping others resolve their disputes and has a special affinity in representing clients in labor and employment law matters. She regularly provides advice and counseling to management pertaining to labor and employment law compliance. She also assists clients with investigations of harassment and discrimination charges and identifying potential employment-related issues that may arise. In addition, Sally regularly volunteers at several legal clinics and earned a mediator certification. Prior to joining Burke, Sally worked at multiple law firms in the San Francisco Bay Area where she represented clients in individual and class action employment cases in state, federal, and administrative proceedings before the California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE), the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH), and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).

Kyle Anne Piasecki

Kyle Anne Piasecki is an associate attorney at the Los Angeles office of Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP. She practices with the firm’s Litigation Department. Kyle Anne received her law degree in 2016 from the University of Michigan Law School. While in law school, she served as a Senior Editor of the Michigan Journal of Law Reform and published an Article in the journal entitled Surviving Preemption in a World of Comprehensive Regulations, 49 U. MICH. J.L. REFORM (2015). Kyle Anne graduated magna cum laude in 2011 from Macalester College with a Bachelor of Arts degree in Sociology. Prior to joining Burke, Kyle Anne clerked for The Honorable Steven B. Berlin in the Department of Labor Office of Administrative Law Judges.

Pooja V. Patel

Pooja Patel is an associate attorney at the Los Angeles office of Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP and is a member of the Labor and Employment Law Practice Group. Prior to joining Burke, Pooja represented employees and employers in employment litigation including wage and hour disputes, discrimination claims, and wrongful termination in both California and Federal Courts. Pooja has substantial experience in counseling employers in pre-litigation matters, representing employers in administrative hearings, and all stages of civil litigation. In representing employers in Department of Labor wage and hour audits and unpaid wage disputes in front of the California Labor Commissioner’s Office, Pooja analyzed pay records for numerous employees to determine whether any California or Federal wage violations existed. While in law school, Pooja was a Senior Editor for the Law Review, a member of the Jonathon M. Ault Mock Trial Team, and served as an Extern for the United States Attorney’s Office, Northern District of Ohio. Pooja is currently a Community Events Co-Director for the South Asian Bar Association of North America, Southern California.

Dana R. Cohn

Dana Cohn is an associate in Burke’s Oakland office. She is a member of the Public Law and Litigation Practice Groups and provides advisory and litigation services to public entities throughout California. Dana represents public agencies defending a variety of claims in civil and administrative courts. She prepares dispositive motions, negotiates with opposing counsel to craft settlements agreeable to all parties, and engages in client and witness preparation for both direct testimony and questions on cross-examination. These experiences have provided Dana with an in-depth understanding of how to best serve clients and anticipate likely issues prior to them arising. Dana also has a wealth of experience providing counsel on Political and Election Law issues. She has worked on political campaigns throughout California and across the nation, most recently as the Deputy Voter Protection Director for the Hillary Clinton campaign in Nevada. She is well versed in California’s political regulatory acts, including the Political Reform Act, the Public Records Act, and the Brown Act. Dana holds a dual degree in Political Science and Rhetoric from the University of California, Berkeley, and received her Juris Doctor from the University of California, Hastings College of Law. She was the Executive Symposium Editor for the Hastings Women’s Law Journal and spearheaded the journal’s 25th Anniversary Symposium, with keynote speaker House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi. During law school, Dana externed for the BART Office of General Counsel, the Fair Political Practices Commission, and the Los Angeles City Attorney.

Kristin E. Charbonnier

Kristin has represented Fortune 500 companies and public utilities, and has achieved favorable results for her clients in jury trials, arbitrations and mediations. Kristin earned her J.D. from UC Davis where she served as Editor-In-Chief of the Business Law Journal.

Maxwell Blum is an Associate in Burke’s Oakland office. His practice focuses on litigation involving public entities. Maxwell is a reviewer for the California Municipal Law Handbook published by CEB. Prior to joining Burke, Maxwell practiced for several years at an international law firm where he worked on complex commercial litigation and internal investigations. During law school, Maxwell worked as a summer law clerk for the Environmental Protection Agency’s Office of Regional Counsel for Region 9 and worked at Penn Law’s criminal defense clinic.

Mark J. Austin

Mark Austin is a partner at the law firm of Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP, where his legal practice focuses on business and municipal litigation, with emphases real estate litigation, land use litigation, municipal tort defense (including employment-related torts and wrongful death matters), partnership disputes, and environmental litigation. Mark has extensive trial experience, having handled multiple successful jury trials, bench trials, and arbitrations, and has successfully argued before the California Court of Appeal over a dozen times. From 2007 through 2014, Mark was consistently named a California “Rising Star” by Super Lawyers magazine due to his demonstrated skill in civil litigation. Mark began his career focusing on litigation for and against public entities, with cases including complex land-use matters, employment and discrimination disputes, constitutional claims, and wrongful-death tort claims. Since that time, Mark has expanded his practice to include complex commercial disputes on behalf of developers and businesses of all sizes, general real-estate litigation, and environmental litigation. In his several years of practice, Mark’s clients have included residential and commercial developers, nationally recognized private companies, cities, counties, small businesses, and private homeowners. In addition to his litigation focus, Mark has also advised both developer and public-agency clients on acquisition and local permitting issues on a broad array of development projects, and has negotiated and drafted various real estate, acquisition, and ﬁnancing instruments, including purchase agreements, easements, deeds, leases, city and county permits, and others. He has acted as deputy city attorney for a number of cities, and in 2015 he acted as the Interim City Attorney for the City of Calexico and as the general counsel for the South Coast Regional Occupational Program.

Rodolfo Aguado III

Rodolfo Aguado III is an associate in the Litigation Practice Group. Rodolfo represents diverse clients such as public and private entities, nonprofit corporations, nonprofit public benefit corporations, and their employees in state and federal courts. Rodolfo has been involved in cases at various stages including pre-litigation investigations, arbitrations and administrative hearings, all phases of civil litigation, settlement conferences, and mediations. Rodolfo has handled employment, civil rights, personal injury, and general litigation matters, and has prepared pre-litigation reports and preliminary liability analyses for insurers and clients.

Charles O. Zuver

For almost two decades, Chip has advised clients in a wide variety of industries on labor and employment matters with a primary focus on traditional labor matters under the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”). Chip began his career at the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) and has experience settling disputes, drafting collective bargaining agreements, and handling purchase sale agreements, reductions in force, bargaining and effects bargaining, neutrality agreements, and strike contingency planning. He often advises clients in the drafting of employee handbooks, drug and alcohol testing policies, enforceability of arbitration agreements, as well as with regard to wage and hour issues and labor matters under the NLRA. Chip also has experience defending an employer against unfair labor practice charges and allegations of bad faith bargaining before the California Agricultural Labor Relations Board. Chip’s position as a former attorney for the NLRB allowed him to build a deep and varied skill set for investigating, responding to unfair labor practice charges, and negotiating settlement agreements for unfair labor practices. Chip began his career as an attorney for the NLRB, serving as an attorney to Board members, as well as an attorney for the Office of Appeals and Region 31. Chip also served as labor counsel to the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers, where he supported the president and vice president of the organization in various issues related to labor law and assisted the studios effectively arbitrating grievances.

Stephanie Vollmer

Stephanie Vollmer is an associate in Burke, Williams & Sorensen’s San Francisco office and a member of the Public Law Practice Group where she provides advisory services to public entities. Prior to joining Burke, Stephanie worked as a new attorney for the City of Benicia where she wrote ordinances and advised city officials on Fair Political Practice Commission (FPPC) matters. Prior to specializing in public law, Stephanie was a research attorney for the Honorable Bonnie Sabraw (Ret.) at ADR Services, Inc. where she worked on complex litigation cases. Stephanie has also worked as a volunteer and pro bono attorney on legal matters involving landlord/tenant disputes, debtors’ rights, and guardianships for the Bar Association of San Francisco’s Justice and Diversity Center; Bay Area Legal Aid; and, the Alameda County Bar Association’s VLSC division where she was Volunteer of the Year in 2017. Before entering the legal profession, Stephanie owned a marketing and advertising firm specializing in high tech, publishing, and consumer goods whose clients included companies ranging from PayPal, TiVo, and McAfee, to Wired magazine, Fodor’s, bareMinerals, and the YMCA.

Karen T. Tsui

Karen T. Tsui is an associate in Burke, Williams & Sorensen's Los Angeles office. Karen’s areas of practice include insurance coverage disputes and bad faith liability litigation. Prior to joining Burke, Karen defended product liability and complex tort actions on behalf of automotive manufacturers and medical malpractice insurance providers in both state and federal courts. Karen has substantial experience in all phases of civil litigation, including written and expert discovery, law and motion practice, settlement negotiations, and trial preparation. Karen earned her J.D. from Loyola Law School where she participated in the Scoot Moot Court Competition. While attending law school, she also served as a judicial extern in the Los Angeles Superior Court. Prior to law school, she earned her undergraduate degree from the University of California, Los Angeles.

Edward L. Shaffer

A former professional city planner, Ed Shaffer excels in achieving positive outcomes for environmental, land use, and real estate law clients. He manages regulatory practices and resolves objections by interested parties such as applicants, neighbor groups, agency staff and decision makers. Ed represents real estate developers, commercial and industrial property owners, and public agencies. He is well versed in EIRs, development agreements and vested rights, general plans and zoning, use permits and subdivision matters. A major aspect of his practice involves guiding projects through the complex requirements of CEQA environmental review and development approval. In the process, Ed is able to strengthen the defensibility of approvals at risk of litigation. His prior career as a city planner and planning consultant gives him special insight into the priorities of public officials and the best path to achieving approvals that satisfy all parties. Ed is known for his attention to detail without losing sight of the client’s overall goals, whether spotting serious errors in an EIR, negotiating key terms of a contract, or making sure approval conditions are workable. Ed works with both buyers and sellers negotiating complex real estate options and purchase agreements, performing due diligence for the transactions, clearing title issues and helping close the deal. He also handles property rights matters, resolving and documenting easements and related issues. Ed is active in the East Bay Leadership Council, an advocacy organization promoting the economic vitality and quality of life in Contra Costa County, the Bay Area, and the state, and for many years he served as Co-Chair of the Council’s Land Use Task Force and currently sits on the Board of Directors. These efforts involve close interaction with public officials at local, regional and state levels of government as well as key business leaders.

Lindsay M. Samuel

Prior to joining Burke, Lindsay Samuel served as Title IX Coordinator at the University of Louisiana at Lafayette. In her role as Title IX Coordinator, she served as the designated agent of the University with primary responsibility for coordinating University Title IX compliance efforts. Lindsay oversaw compliance of University policy in relation to Title IX legal developments; implemented grievance procedures, including notification, investigation and disposition of complaints; and conducted investigations of complaints received pursuant to University discrimination and harassment policies. Lindsay also served for five years as a staff attorney and supervising attorney at the Orleans Public Defender’s Office in New Orleans, Louisiana. During her tenure, Lindsay tirelessly and passionately represented indigent criminal defendants from arrest to verdict conducting hundreds of hearings, bench and jury trials. Lindsay earned her B.S., magna cum laude, in Business Management and American Studies from Tulane University and her J.D. from Emory University School of Law.

Gerald J. Ramiza

Jerry Ramiza's practice emphasizes real estate transactional, land use, and public/private partnership development matters. Real Estate/Land Use/Public Private Partnerships Jerry represents private clients and public agencies throughout California in connection with complex real estate and land use matters and transactions. Jerry’s work includes forward planning, assisting with development, land use, entitlement, design review, and permitting processes, environmental review, and CEQA/NEPA compliance. He routinely handles negotiation and documentation of purchase, sale, easement, lease and financing transactions; asset management (including loan administration, property management and landlord/tenant matters); negotiation and drafting of complex development agreements; foreclosures; public trust and tidelands transactions; surplus lands dispositions; workouts and secured transactions; and ancillary matters such as title insurance review, due diligence, environmental risk allocation and hazardous materials/ Brownfields matters. With over 15 years of experience in the redevelopment arena, Jerry is assisting successor agencies throughout the state in the implementation of the redevelopment dissolution act, ABx1 26. He also advises public agency clients in connection with the ferry-system transactions, affordable housing, federal contracting/BRAC process, utilization of federal grants, lease and parking revenue financing and assessment districts.

Charles W. Reese

Charles W. Reese’s over thirty-five years of legal practice include significant litigation experience at both the trial and appellate levels on behalf of both local public entities and private businesses. He has been actively involved with regulatory compliance and cost recovery litigation at many environmentally contaminated sites throughout the western United States, and with numerous transactions involving the acquisition, sale, and environmental regulation of businesses and real property. Chuck’s background includes litigation and transactional experience in the mining, engineering, chemical, and construction industries and in representing public entities. He is experienced with compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and with air, water, and hazardous substance regulations. He has successfully represented major corporations and numerous public entities in significant cases at both the state and federal trial and appellate levels. In addition, Chuck is an experienced negotiator and advisor for both public and private entities. He has served on the board of directors of several national environmental engineering and manufacturing corporations. Chuck was the President and CEO of Wulfsberg Reese & Colvig prior to its merger with Burke.

Richard J. Reynolds

Rick Reynolds practices primarily in the areas of real estate and financial services litigation, business litigation, transactional real estate, lending law, and bankruptcy law on behalf of clients in California, Nevada, and Arizona. He practices in the State, Federal, and Bankruptcy Courts, as well as the Courts of Appeal. His experience includes the purchase and sale of real property and businesses, secured transactions, asset purchases and sales in Bankruptcy, receiverships, partition, easement and boundary disputes, contract and business tort litigation, and foreclosure-related litigation. Rick is also a California Licensed Real Estate Broker. The national directory of attorneys Martindale-Hubbell has awarded Rick its AV Preeminent rating, indicating that peers rank him at the highest level of professional excellence.

Rachel H. Richman

Rachel has proudly provided contract city attorney and general counsel services to public agencies throughout California for nearly 20 years. Rachel is the City Attorney for the City of Delano and General Counsel to the Successor Agency of the Delano Redevelopment Agency. She is City Attorney for the City Rosemead and Commission Counsel to the Successor Agency of the Rosemead Community Development Commission. Rachel is also Assistant City Attorney for the City of Alhambra, Assistant General Counsel to the Successor Agency to the Alhambra Redevelopment Agency; and Assistant City Attorney for the City of Santa Clarita. She is the former City Attorney to the City of Arvin (2008-2013), and former Legal Counsel to the Santa Clarita Manufactured Home Rent Control Panel (2006-2017). Rachel has extensive experience providing legal and practical advice to city councils, agency boards, city managers, department heads, and staff on a broad range of issues including planning and zoning, CEQA, conflicts of interest, open meeting laws, public contracting, prevailing wages, public records, first amendment issues, code enforcement, elections, ADA and mobile home regulations. She drafts opinions, ordinances, resolutions, and negotiates and drafts agreements. She attends as legal counsel, city council meetings, planning commission meetings, and mobile home rent control panel meetings. Rachel is experienced working on behalf of cities with developers on commercial, residential, and mixed use projects. She has negotiated and drafted development agreements, exclusive negotiating agreements, owner participation and disposition and development agreements, and affordable housing agreements. She has worked on general plan updates, specific plans and amendments, first time home buyer agreements, façade improvement agreements, and reviewing and advising on CEQA documents. Rachel handles various aspects of labor and employment matters. These matters include responding to DFEH complaints, discipline and grievance matters, drafting personnel policies and working with the city’s team for labor negotiations. Rachel regularly handles issues related to public works construction projects, including development of notices inviting bids, to reviewing bids and recommendation of award, she has dealt with challenges to the low bidder as well as advising on dealing with construction delays, stop notices, liquidated damages issues and prevailing wage issues. Rachel also has experience in eminent domain on behalf of cities, agencies, and for the Alameda Corridor-East Construction Authority involving pre-condemnation activities, initiation of condemnation actions, and drafting and negotiating settlement agreements. She is also cognizant of the public concerns that exist with the use of eminent domain. Rachel provides training on ethics, municipal governance ADA inclusion requirements and transparency laws to firm clients as well as providing presentations at various municipal conferences. Rachel was Chair of the League's FPPC Committee from 2016-2018. While at law school, Rachel was a member of Loyola's Moot Court Honors Board and received "Top Ten Brief" recognition. She was on the National Moot Court team and winner of the Regional National Moot Court competition. During law school she was a law clerk for the Community Redevelopment Agency of Los Angeles and the Los Angeles County Counsel's Public Works Department. In her approach to working with legislative bodies, staff and others to achieve their goals which can often be full of challenges she ascribes to the following prospective: “There are no shortcuts to any place worth going.” (Beverly Sills)

Steven D. Roland

Steve Roland is active in the handling of real estate litigation involving purchase and sale, leaseholds, secured transactions, land-use and entitlement litigation, eminent domain, inverse condemnation, title issues, CC&R’s and joint venture and partnership disputes. Steve has represented Fortune 500 companies, financial institutions, developers, public entities, landlords, tenants, retailers, owner-managers and brokers in matters involving shopping centers, urban and suburban mixed-use projects, condominium developments, office towers, business parks, industrial properties, master planned communities, hotel and resort projects, and mining projects. Steve’s practice also encompasses commercial matters, including unfair competition, trade secret, licensing, partnership and contract issues. Steve has extensive jury trial, court trial and arbitration experience and has regularly appeared before administrative agencies including planning commissions, city councils and administrative appeals boards. Steve’s work has involved properties and transactions in numerous states and in England, Canada, Norway and Australia. In addition to practicing in the federal and state courts of California, Steve has been admitted to practice pro hac vice or otherwise provided counsel in matters in Florida, Colorado, Texas, New Jersey, Nevada, Oregon, Hawaii, Washington and Delaware. Steve commenced private practice following clerkships with the California Supreme Court, Honorable Frank Richardson, and the San Francisco Superior Court, Honorable Ira Brown. He has served as an arbitrator and settlement panelist for the San Francisco Superior Court and as an expert witness on matters pertaining to the standard of care of counsel in commercial litigation.

David A. Rosenthal

David Rosenthal practices in the areas of general business and commercial, securities, technology, corporate, partnership, limited liability company, mergers and acquisitions, real estate, public entity, and construction law. He has also drafted and negotiated numerous construction industry contracts, including construction, construction management, and design, for public, private, and non-profit owners, architects, engineers, and consultants. David previously practiced with a San Francisco law firm specializing in commercial leasing and lending, as well as general corporate and public and private securities issuance. He is admitted to practice in California. When not working, he spends his time taste testing local ethnic foods and hiking.

Sergey (Sergio) A. Rudin

Sergio Rudin is a senior associate in the Public Law practice group and provides advisory, transactional, and litigation services to cities, counties, special districts, and other public entities throughout California. Sergio’s practice includes advising clients on all aspects of municipal law, including cannabis regulation, contracts, elections, franchises, municipal finance, land use, open meetings, public records, and redevelopment. Sergio previously served as staff counsel to the California State Water Resources Control Board, where he advised on various programs for funding water, wastewater, storm water, and wastewater infrastructure, including the Clean Water State Revolving Fund and the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund, negotiated project financing transactions, and advised on state and federal compliance matters. Prior to state employment, he worked for a private firm primarily representing general contractors in complex commercial litigation in various forums. Sergio also served as a law clerk to Judge Vidmar at the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico.

Deepa Sharma

Deepa Sharma provides litigation and advisory services to a broad range of public and private sector clients throughout California. While in law school, Deepa served as a law clerk in the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Transit Administration (FTA), which oversees federal grants to state and local transit providers. She interned at the State of California’s Office of Legislative Counsel, where she assisted in drafting legislation in the areas of energy, environmental, transportation, and education law. Deepa also served as a judicial extern to the Honorable Maria P. Rivera of the California Court of Appeal, and was a staff editor and executive board member for the Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly. Before law school, Deepa served as a policy aide in the California State Legislature, and worked as a political consultant to various local and statewide campaigns.

Edith Sanchez Shea

Edith Shea is an experienced civil litigator and she has represented private and public clients in state and federal actions and appeals. Edith maintains a varied litigation practice and has handled matters in the areas of life, health and disability insurance, bad faith insurance law, Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA") litigation, employment law, and construction. She has also represented clients in complex actions and class actions. Prior to entering the private sector, Edith was a Trial Attorney with the United States Department of Justice and tried cases to verdict before the United States Court of International Trade, and otherwise represented the United States before that court and before the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals. Edith has successfully resolved numerous matters through dispositive motions, including a recent grant of summary judgment in a rescission matter and the grant of a motion to dismiss without leave to amend in an employment matter. She has also tried cases to verdict on behalf of corporate clients, before the United States District Courts for the Central and Southern Districts of California, and before the Superior Court for the State of California and she has briefed and argued appeals before the California Court of Appeal and the Ninth Circuit. Edith has also resolved numerous cases through alternative dispute resolution. In addition to representing clients in many mediations and settlement conferences, Edith has served as a mediator and as an Alternative Dispute Resolution Neutral for the Los Angeles Superior Court. She also completed training on Mediating the Litigated Case at the Straus Institute for Dispute Resolution at Pepperdine University School of Law. Edith has spoken at professional conferences. She lectured on class action developments at the ABA Conference in 2016, on deposition topics at the 2014 Eastern Claim Conference and on developments in ERISA litigation at the 2012 Defense Research Institute Conference. Edith is fluent in Spanish.

Anna C. Shimko

Anna Shimko is Chair of Burke's Real Estate and Business Practice Group. She focuses her practice on all areas of land use, real estate development, and environmental law, representing both public agencies and private landowners and developers in administrative and court proceedings to bring projects to fruition. Anna has particular expertise in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). She works closely with project proponents, public agencies, and environmental consultants on preparing and defending CEQA and NEPA documents such as negative declarations, environmental impact reports (EIRs), and environmental impact statements (EISs), including for complex projects such as water rights transfers, multi-phased mixed-use projects and large campus master plans. Anna helps private clients through all stages of the land use approval process, obtaining entitlements to build or expand large shopping centers, stand-alone retail stores, mixed-use projects, hospitals, hotels and resorts, golf courses, residential developments, and quarries, among others. She also assists cities, counties, special districts, and state agencies in regulating land and development, negotiating real estate transactional documents and development agreements, and updating general plans, specific plans, and zoning codes. Anna represents clients in matters involving the Subdivision Map Act, annexation, historic resources, public-private partnership transactions and financing mechanisms, the Coastal Act, air quality regulations, water supply, climate change regulations, transportation planning, eminent domain, and inverse condemnation. Anna litigates land use, CEQA, and NEPA matters for public and private clients at trial court and appellate court levels, and serves as an expert witness throughout California in cases involving land use development issues.

Kevin D. Siegel

Kevin represents cities and other local agencies regarding a wide range of public law matters, including land use and planning, CEQA and environmental law, inverse condemnation and eminent domain, open meeting and public records, taxes and assessments, elections and initiatives, contracts and torts, and due process and other issues of constitutional law. Kevin provides litigation as well as advisory services. Kevin joined Burke, Williams & Sorensen in August 2012. Prior to joining Burke, Kevin was a Deputy City Attorney for the City of Oakland, where he specialized in writs and appeals. Previously, Kevin was a shareholder at McDonough Holland & Allen, where he litigated cases for public agencies across the State, and a Legal Research Attorney for the San Francisco Superior Court, where he advised judges regarding complex litigation. Kevin endeavors to reach positive outcomes for his clients, without litigation. But when litigation is necessary, Kevin zealously pursues successful outcomes in court.

Charles E. Slyngstad

Charlie Slyngstad is the Chair of the Litigation Practice Group. His public law and private client practice involves the relationships between employers and employees, businesses and contracting parties, and lawyers and clients. He has experience as lead trial counsel in cases that included allegations of fraud, employee whistleblowing and retaliation, race discrimination, the False Claims Act, conflicts of interest, employee pension and welfare benefits, wrongful termination, legal malpractice, malicious prosecution, alter ego, breach of fiduciary duty, and breach of contract. He also has handled many appeals, for both public and private clients. Labor and Employment Law Charlie has represented private and public employers in employment matters, providing preventive counseling and litigation defense against various legal theories. His representation has involved different industries, including health care, transportation, travel, entertainment, employee benefits, apparel, real estate, and housing. He has advised the Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles since 2006, for which he has successfully prosecuted former employees and others who misused federal funds provided to the agency. In several lengthy employment jury trials in Los Angeles Superior Court, Charlie was lead counsel for his client in reaching verdicts on whistleblower retaliation claims. He served as the primary attorney for a national employee benefits firm in a Department of Labor lead enforcement case in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. His class action experience has included serving as appointed class counsel on behalf of Plaintiff and Defendant classes. Litigation Charlie is certified as a specialist in Legal Malpractice Law by the Board of Legal Specialization of the State Bar of California, a subject area that includes the prosecution and defense of lawyers in professional liability disputes, conflicts of interest, ethics, malicious prosecution, and anti-SLAPP motions. In addition to matters involving lawyers and clients, he also has handled many complex business litigation cases for private companies, and claims for and against qui tam plaintiffs and others under the federal and state False Claims Acts in the healthcare, defense, entertainment, and housing industries. Additional cases have included a wide variety of other torts, including accounting malpractice, securities fraud and multiple fraudulent Ponzi schemes, violations of Business & Professions Code section 17200, creditors’ claims, false advertising, real estate transactions, bank fraud, and trademarks and trade names. He has taken to trial more than 35 such cases in California courts, including federal courts. Real Estate and Business Law Charlie, in association with bankruptcy counsel, advised Victor Valley Community Hospital as special corporate and litigation counsel in connection with obtaining the consent of the California Attorney General to sell all of its assets and thereafter confirming its Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation. He has acted as outside counsel and provided advice to a number of businesses, including other health care enterprises, closely held companies, and sole proprietorships. He currently acts as outside general counsel for the Odd Fellows Home of California, which owns and operates two large retirement communities in Napa and Saratoga, a role he also performed for Victor Valley Community Hospital from 1995-2011. In addition, Charlie has assisted court appointed receivers in workouts and liquidations of businesses under court supervision.

Alan A. Sozio

A recognized figure in his field of eminent domain, Alan Sozio has played a lead role in numerous multi-parcel property acquisition projects throughout California. In addition to providing eminent domain legal services to more than 17 public agencies, Alan has since 2001 served as special acquisition counsel for the Alameda Corridor-East Construction Authority in property acquisitions spanning more than 11 grade separation projects in the San Gabriel Valley. He is the co-author of the seminal practice guide used by public agency practitioners entitled “Eminent Domain: A Step-by-Step Guide to the Acquisition of Real Property,” and is the author of the popular eminent domain blog, “Right to Take | Doing it the Right (of) Way—Recommended Steps for the Acquisition of Real Property by Eminent Domain.” He is active in the eminent domain legal community where he is a frequent speaker and author on topics related to condemnation. Alan counsels public clients on early considerations and pre-acquisition activities necessary to the condemnation process. He litigates eminent domain and inverse condemnation actions and, when necessary, takes the matters through trial. Alan also drafts transactional documents, including purchase and sale agreements, right-of-entry agreements and leases, and provides advice regarding state and federal relocation assistance. He has appeared in both open and closed session with city councils, agency boards and other legislative bodies to speak on matters related to the acquisition of property and the condemnation process. In addition to eminent domain actions, Alan litigates matters involving physical and regulatory takings, contractual and boundary disputes, unlawful detainer matters, land use and real estate issues. In 2005, Alan successfully completed the Los Angeles County Bar Association’s Trial Advocacy Program. Thereafter, on a pro bono basis, Alan prosecuted to verdict criminal cases, and obtained favorable bench rulings in evidentiary trials, for the cities of Anaheim and Inglewood. Alan is a Brown Belt in the Israeli self-defense system of Krav Maga, and is a former "AA" rated competitive beach volleyball player. When not at the office, he enjoys surfing, skiing, and relaxing with his family on the beach.

Benjamin L. Stock

Benjamin Stock is an accomplished litigator in both state and federal courts. His litigation and transactional practice emphasizes municipal law, eminent domain, land use, and construction law. Additionally, Ben serves as Town Attorney for both Ross and Tiburon, City Attorney for the City of Benicia, and General Counsel for Eastern Contra Costa Transit Authority, Sanitary District Number 5, Sausalito-Marin City Sanitary District, and Vallejo Flood and Wastewater District. With regard to his eminent domain practice, Ben plays a key role in public clients' property acquisition activities. He counsels public clients on early considerations and pre-acquisition activities necessary to the condemnation process. He also litigates condemnation actions, negotiates settlements and, when necessary, takes the matters through trial. Additionally, Ben drafts transactional documents related to the acquisition of property through eminent domain. He is currently assisting multiple public entities with their condemnation needs throughout the state. Ben has spoken at numerous conferences on issues involving eminent domain. In addition to eminent domain, Ben has extensive experience representing public entities in litigation at both the trial court and appellate court levels. His areas of specialization include inverse condemnation and land use, CEQA, breach of contract, environmental law, and dangerous conditions public liability. Ben also assists numerous public entities across the state on complex land use matters and in tax allocation matters before the State Board of Equalization.

Katy A. Suttorp

Katy Suttorp, a partner in the Orange County office of Burke, Williams and Sorensen, LLP, represents and counsels a wide range of employers, including municipalities, special districts, school districts, community college districts, and private entities, in numerous labor and employment law matters. These include disability accommodation and interactive process, employee discipline and due process, leaves and benefits, state and federal wage and hour audits and disputes, wrongful termination, workplace investigations, Firefighters Procedural Bill of Rights Act/Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act, employee speech and privacy, workplace violence, pre-employment and privacy issues, including drug and alcohol testing, HIPAA/California Confidentiality of Medical Information Act, and CalPERS and CalSTRS audits and disputes. In connection with that representation, Katy has drafted and revised a variety of personnel rules and employee handbooks, personnel-related ordinances and resolutions, board policies and administrative regulations, collective bargaining agreements/memoranda of understanding, and employer-employee resolutions/local rules. To further educate clients regarding many of these issues, Katy has developed in-depth, customized training focused on clients’ particular problems and areas of concern, including interactive process and reasonable accommodation, discipline and due process, performance evaluations, and prevention of harassment, discrimination, retaliation, and abusive conduct. Katy also provides advice and representation for a variety of labor matters, including acting as lead negotiator, representing agencies in proceedings before PERB, and providing workplace training addressing challenges in supervising represented employees. During law school, Katy clerked at the U.C. Davis office of the Campus Counsel and served as a summer extern for the Honorable Gary A. Feess, a judge of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. She also served as editor-in-chief of the environmental law and policy journal, Environs. In recent years, Katy completed a two-year appointment to the Program Review Committee for the American Inns of Court.

Kane Thuyen

Kane Thuyen is an attorney specializing in public law with experience representing numerous cities, county agencies, special districts, school districts, and nonprofit organizations in both an advisory and litigation capacity. In his advisory capacity, Kane has provided advice and opinions on various public law issues, including the Public Records Act, the Brown Act, the Government Claims Act, and the Political Reform Act, among others. He also regularly serves as counsel during Planning Commission and City Council meetings. In his litigation capacity, Kane has not only successfully defended governmental entities against writs of mandate and tort claims, but has also prosecuted code enforcement and criminal matters as a city prosecutor. Kane regularly contributes to the League of California Cities as a Reviewer for the California Municipal Law Handbook. In addition, he contributes to the California Special Districts Association’s Brown Act Manual and California Public Records Act Manual. Kane received his dual B.A. in History and in Legal Studies in 2004 from the University of California at Berkeley, and his J.D. from Loyola Law School in 2008. During law school, Kane was a Note and Comment Editor for the Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Review. He also served as a judicial extern to the Honorable Margaret M. Morrow of the U.S. District Court – Central District of California.

Albert Tong

Albert Tong has represented private and publicly-traded companies in a broad range of complex civil litigation matters, including insurance and reinsurance, securities, employment, intellectual property, antitrust, Proposition 65, and franchise disputes. He has extensive experience in pre-trial, trial, and appellate advocacy, and arbitrations and mediations.

Kelly A. Trainer

Kelly Trainer is a partner in Burke's Orange County office, representing employers in labor and employment law matters. Kelly has represented and advised employers on matters involving numerous federal and state law claims, including discrimination, harassment, retaliation, disability and leaves of absence, wrongful termination, leaves of absence, wage and hour, freedom of speech and association, and privacy. In addition, Kelly's practice includes representation of public employers in areas unique to public employment such as due process, disciplinary procedures, the MMBA, CalPERS, the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights, and the Firefighters Procedural Bill of Rights. Kelly has an extensive counseling practice, concentrating on preventive measures of employment and labor law. In this regard, her practice has focused on working cooperatively with management and human resources professionals on the handling of a variety of labor and employment matters. She also revises personnel rules, employee handbooks, personnel ordinances, and specific policies. Kelly is an experienced and engaging trainer. She regularly conducts seminars and workplace trainings for employees and officials on matters such as harassment prevention, disability discrimination, workplace investigations, diversity and inclusion, unconscious bias, managing difficult employees, workplace violence, discipline and termination, social media, performance evaluations, creating effective documentation, and leaves of absence. Kelly has acted as lead negotiator during labor negotiations for public agencies, and has negotiated numerous labor agreements. In addition to labor negotiations, Kelly has experience in handling related labor relations issues such as grievances and PERB proceedings, and she regularly advises employers on such matters. Kelly is a member of the Association of Workplace Investigators, and has served as a neutral investigator and fact-finder for internal investigations of employment complaints.

Brian A. Pierik

Education and Employment Brian Pierik received his Bachelor of Arts degree in Political Science from Loyola University in Los Angeles and his Juris Doctor degree from Loyola School of Law. Brian has been a partner at Burke, Williams & Sorensen since 1982. Public Law Brian is the City Attorney for the City of Camarillo and the City of Atascadero. Brian is also the District Counsel for the Rancho Simi Recreation and Parks District which owns and operates 55 parks in the City of Simi Valley and surrounding areas of Ventura County. Brian has also served as special counsel to over 40 public agencies in California in a wide range of matters including: Brown Act, Public Records Act, conflicts of interest, land use, property transactions (sales, purchases, leases, licenses), LAFCO, annexations, drafting ordinances, resolutions and contracts, AB 1234 training, elections, transportation; public works, airport issues, civil rights, planning, environmental, growth control, administrative law, tort and other liability, employment law, litigation, appeals, eminent domain, inverse condemnation, land movement, and many other public law matters. Brian has written and presented papers before the City Attorneys Department of the League of California Cities, City Attorneys’ Association of Los Angeles County, California Specialized Training Institute, Public Works Officers Institute, City Clerk’s Department of the League of California Cities, and Southern California Water Utilities Association. Litigation Experience Brian has successfully represented many public agencies throughout California in litigation in both the trial courts and appellate courts. Recent cases include: Land Use: City of Goleta v. Superior Court, 40 Cal. 4th 270 (2006). The California Supreme Court ruled in favor of the City finding that a newly incorporated City has the authority to deny the Final Map. Land Use: Gong v. City of Rosemead, 226 Cal. App. 4th 363 (2014). This is an important case for public agencies with regard to many issues including the discussion on Government Code Section 815.3, the Government Code claims requirement, judicial notice, and the immunity provisions of Government Code Section 818.4. Brown Act: Taxpayers for Livable Communities v. City of Malibu, 126 Cal. App. 4th 1123 (2005). Brian successfully represented the City at trial of this Brown Act case. CEQA: SCOPE v. City of Santa Clarita, 197 Cal. App. 4th 1042 (2011). Brian represented the City at the trial on the Petition for Writ of Mandate. The trial court ruled in favor of the City and the judgment was affirmed on appeal. CEQA: Save Atascadero v. City of Atascadero, 2014 WL 3105199 (July 8, 2014). Petition for Writ of Mandate challenging the City of Atascadero’s approval of the Del Rio Commercial Specific Plan. The trial court ruled in favor of the City which was sustained on appeal. CEQA: SCOPE v. City of Santa Clarita; Vista Canyon Ranch, 2014 WL 7204118 (2014). Petition for Writ of Mandate alleging CEQA violations by the City on a 185 acre residential and commercial project. The trial court ruled in favor of the Petitioner. On appeal, the Court of Appeal reversed the trial court decision and ruled in favor of the City. Election Contest: Tran v. City of Rosemead, LASC Case No. GS 011559 (June 2009). Petition for Writ of Mandate in which Brian successfully represented the City at trial. Former Mayor John Tran alleged the City wrongfully rejected absentee ballots on the basis of signatures which did not match the voter registration signature. Eminent Domain: City of Santa Clarita v. NTS Systems, 137 Cal. App. 4th 264 (2006). Eminent domain case to acquire property for the construction of a major arterial road in the City. Brian was trial counsel for the City of Santa Clarita. The trial court ruled in favor of the City and the judgment was affirmed on appeal. Public Works Brian has substantial experience in all phases public works, examples include: Springville Interchange: Completed in 2012 on time and within budget, the Springville Interchange was constructed on U.S. 101 in the City of Camarillo at a cost $40 million. Brian assisted with many phases of the Springville Interchange Project including review of bid documents and advice on construction issues. Camarillo Library: Opened in 2007, replacing the former library, and at 65,621 square feet is one of the best libraries in the State of California. Brian assisted with site acquisition, annexation issues with LAFCO, grant funding, and construction issues on this $28 million project. Atascadero City Hall Project: Brian was involved in providing legal advice to the City of Atascadero on a major reconstruction project of the Atascadero Historic City Hall with project cost $33 million. The project was completed in 2015 on time and within budget. Water Desalinization Plant: This City of Camarillo project will be bid in late 2018 and will cost approximately $50 million and treat groundwater that is high in salt content in order to provide potable water for the community. Brian has assisted in all phases of this project including site acquisition, annexation issues with LAFCO and project approvals. Real Estate Brian has extensive experience in real property transactions, examples include: Sale of City Property for Hotel Conference Center: A $70 million project; Brian assisted with the sale of 12 acres to the developer and the contracts for public improvements. Sale of Rancho Simi Recreation and Park District Property: The District owns 13 acres in the City of Simi Valley that was utilized for District offices and other purposes. Brian assisted the District with sale of property for $21 million. Purchase: Alamos Canyon, Rancho Simi Recreation and Park District. Brian assisted Park District with the acquisition of 326 acres in Alamos Canyon for open space including 55 acres of sensitive habitat. Sale: Former Camarillo Library. Brian has assisted City staff with the potential reuse of the former library and a proposed sale to a non-profit to construct and operate a children’s museum at the site. Purchase: Guardian Building, Rancho Simi Recreation and Park District. Brian assisted the District with purchase of a building on Guardian in the City of Simi Valley for $9 million as the new site for District Administrative Offices, recreational facilities and maintenance facilities.

Paloma P. Peracchio

Paloma Peracchio represents employers in all areas of employment related litigation, including wage and hour, class actions, representative actions under the Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”), as well discrimination, harassment, and retaliation claims under the Fair Employment and Housing Act. Paloma is an experienced litigator and has represented both public and private entities at all stages of litigation, from inception to trial. Paloma also provides sexual harassment and FEHA training to public and private employers throughout the State of California.

Traci I. Park

Traci Park exclusively advises and assists employers and management in labor and employment law and civil rights litigation. Her wide-ranging practice includes representing clients in FEHA, Title VII, wrongful termination, employee compensation, and civil rights matters. Traci has extensive trial and appellate experience, and she regularly handles grievance arbitrations, disciplinary appeals, administrative hearings, and agency investigations. Traci also has a significant counseling practice, which includes drafting employment policies, performing employment law compliance audits, and advising on employee discipline, performance management, and due process issues. Traci is a member of the Association of Workplace Investigators and frequently serves as a personnel investigator and neutral fact-finder. Traci regularly advises employers about issues and policies related to cyber-security, social media, and on-line conduct of employees and elected officials, and she regularly writes for the California Lawyer Magazine Social Media Column. She contributes to a number of treatises, including the 2010-2018 editions of Legal Trends and the 2001-2007 editions of The California Employer. Traci recently authored articles on use of social media by police, social media policies for public entities, defining on-line threats, social media and the First Amendment, and litigating sexual harassment in the #MeToo environment. Traci is an experienced trainer who has conducted hundreds of seminars on all aspects of employment law and civil litigation. Her recent presentations include Facebook and the First Amendment, hacking and cyber-misconduct, privacy and privilege in litigation, harassment prevention, social media in the workplace, managing difficult employees, HR boot camp for managers, workplace hazing, bullying and violence, administering protected leaves of absence, strategies to prevent lawsuits arising from terminations, disability discrimination, conducting lawful workplace investigations, and effective discipline and workplace documentation. Traci regularly conducts employment law training for members of the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority. She has recently presented for the California State Bar and the PARMA, IPMA-HR International, CalPELRA, CSDA and League of California Cities conferences, among others. Traci likes surfing, Facebook, and the Los Angeles Chargers.

Elizabeth M. Pappy

Elizabeth Pappy has more than 26 years’ experience as a litigator in State and Federal Courts and Arbitration. Her practice focuses on representation of businesses in a wide variety of legal disputes, and advice and counsel. Her clients include businesses and individuals of all sizes and types, including the construction industry, temporary service agencies, recyclers, gas station operators, and high tech companies. Elizabeth’s background as a bankruptcy attorney gives her the advantage of being able to counsel creditors on debtor-creditor rights issues and bankruptcy matters as well as litigate in Bankruptcy Court. She has a particular expertise in successfully handling difficult disputes between family members and matters involving highly emotional and sensitive issues, including probate, palimony and business issues arising in divorce actions. Elizabeth’s personal attention and acuity to the needs of her clients within the context of the litigation system have brought her clients satisfactory results under what are otherwise very unsatisfactory circumstances. In the past 10 years, Elizabeth’s work for business clients has included defense of ADA-construction barrier claims and housing discrimination claims, including a successful trial where the plaintiff sought a $200,000 modification to client premises. She successfully tried the case to a defense verdict and which was upheld by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal.

Nathan A. Oyster

Nathan Oyster’s practice at Burke focuses on two main areas: He defends law enforcement officers and local governments in civil rights litigation, and he provides guidance to law enforcement agencies on the implementation of policies that reduce the likelihood of litigation. Nathan’s litigation experience is extensive, and he currently serves as the lead police litigator for the cities of Alhambra and Hemet, in addition to his work as outside counsel for agencies throughout the state He has tried cases in both state and federal court, with his first jury trial coming at age 24. He has also argued before both the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the California Court of Appeal. Nathan has defended nearly every type of police litigation that an agency could face, including officer-involved shootings, deaths due to excited delirium, class action litigation, malicious prosecution claims, allegations of excessive force, and allegations of unconstitutional jail conditions. He is adept at defending litigation brought under Section 1983, the Unruh Act, the Ralph Act, and the Bane Act. Since joining Burke, Nathan has added advisory work to his litigation practice. Nathan advises law enforcement agencies throughout the state on a variety of policy issues. Nathan is particularly focused on issues pertaining to police body-worn cameras, and he has lectured on that topic in multiple venues. Representative clients include the cities of Alhambra, Cathedral City, Culver City, Delano, Hemet, Rohnert Park, South Lake Tahoe, and St. Helena.

Nicholas J. Muscolino

Nick Muscolino is a partner in the firm’s Oakland office. Nick specializes in the legal and procedural defenses available to public entities under California law. He has successfully represented public entities in trial and appellate courts throughout California in disputes concerning inverse condemnation, preemption, eminent domain, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), water rights, flood and storm water diversions, public nuisance, negligence, quiet title, breach of contract, the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), the Fair Housing Act, the Fair Employment and Housing Act, the First Amendment, Section 1983, preemption, redevelopment dissolution, local land use and zoning, and general plan consistency. Nick also provides advisory services to cities and other public entities. He has served as a deputy or assistant city attorney to several cities. In that capacity, he advises on the Brown Act, the Public Records Act, CEQA, litigation, mobilehome issues, civil rights issues, affordable housing, and other areas of general municipal law. Nick drafts the staff reports, resolutions, ordinances, and agreements (e.g., purchase and sale, joint powers, loan, disposition and development), that public agencies need to serve the public. He also provides opinion letters on the legality of various housing preferences under state and federal law, and other land use and zoning-related issues. Nick graduated Order of the Coif from the University of California, Davis in 2009, where he served as an Executive Editor of the Journal of Environmental Law and Policy. After law school, Nick served as a law clerk to the Honorable Justice Morgan Christen of the Alaska Supreme Court (now of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals) in Anchorage before entering private practice at a large law firm in San Francisco. Nick works closely with clients to understand their goals and to determine how to achieve their desired outcomes in the most cost-effective and timely manner.

Karen W. Murphy

Karen Murphy represents a broad range of local government agencies with an emphasis on land use and planning, real estate, affordable housing and issues relating to the dissolution of redevelopment agencies. Karen served as the Assistant City Attorney of the City of Brentwood from 2006 to 2011, where she was the primary attorney staffing the Community Development Department and former Redevelopment Agency. From 1999 to 2006, Karen was an associate with the law firm of McDonough Holland & Allen, PC, where she represented a number of public agencies, including serving as Assistant General Counsel for the Livermore-Amador Valley Water Management Agency and Deputy Town Attorney for the Town of Moraga and Special Counsel to the Cities and Redevelopment Agencies of Brentwood, San Bruno, Davis and Alameda. Land Use and Planning Karen works extensively on land use and planning matters, including advising public agencies on issues related to CEQA compliance, subdivision map act, land use approval procedures and processing of land use applications, for projects ranging from use permits to complex commercial, mixed-use and residential projects. Karen has negotiated and drafted development agreements and amendments for hotel, residential and mixed-use development projects. Real Estate/Redevelopment Karen’s real estate and redevelopment experience includes drafting and negotiating purchases and sale agreements, leases, lease terminations, easements, licenses, development agreements, disposition and development agreements, and owner participation agreements. She assisted in the formulation, adoption, amendment, and implementation of redevelopment plans and projects, and continues to provide day-to-day advice to clients in the wake of the dissolution of redevelopment agencies. Affordable Housing Karen's affordable housing experience encompasses assisting cities and redevelopment agencies in the establishment and implementation of affordable housing programs (both for-sale and rental), first-time homebuyer programs and residential rehabilitation programs, and advising public agencies regarding compliance with state and federal affordable housing requirements. She negotiates and drafts loan agreements for both rental and for-sale affordable housing projects. Public Law Karen advises public agencies in general municipal law issues, such as code enforcement, nuisance abatement, contract review, Brown Act, Public Records Act, conflict of interest laws, public contract code, and bidding and claims procedures.

Gregory M. Murphy

Gregory Murphy is a trusted advisor, counselor, and transactional attorney for public entities throughout California. He currently serves as City Attorney for the City of Buellton and the City of Temple City and as legal counsel to the San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments’ Alameda Corridor-East Construction Project. Greg also has over 13 years’ experience serving as Assistant or Deputy City Attorney to a number of the firm’s municipal clients and legal counsel to the firm’s special district clients. Greg regularly advises elected and appointed officials, navigating delicate issues with politically-divergent boards. He presents clearly and in real-world terms the impacts of legal constraints on agency activities. Greg takes time to understand clients’ long- and short-term goals and how the law affects those objectives, finding ways to achieve them whenever possible. His focus on crafting legal advice that is practical, workable, and client-centered creates confidence and lasting relationships. Experienced in the areas of land use and development, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), public contract law, prevailing wage law, purchases and sales of real property, and municipal economic issues, Greg has advised developers and public contractors as well as public entities. He attends planning and community development commission meetings and handles closed-session briefings of legislative bodies. He also advises on a number of election law issues ranging from charter amendments and ballot designations to election contests and post-contest litigation. Greg also engages in litigation related to land use, tax, contract, and election issues. What I’ve Learned: Be creative. If you start a project thinking you can find a way to accomplish it, you’ll often be right. If you start by thinking you can’t accomplish it, you’ll always be right.

Mark J. Mulkerin

Mark Mulkerin's practice includes litigation and commercial matters for public and private entities in a wide variety of subject matters. Mark has successfully represented clients in eminent domain, inverse condemnation, land use, ground and riparian water matters, public works, construction law and construction defect actions, business and finance matters, products liability, complex business and personal tort, and computer and Internet-related litigation. Mark has successfully defended public entities, developers, and general contractors, subcontractors, architects, engineers, and other design professionals in multi-party construction defect actions, as well as in general legal matters. He also has successfully represented public entities, businesses, and individuals both in the defense and prosecution of civil litigation claims. Mark has also represented EarthLink Network, Inc. and other commercial enterprises in computer law, general business, and Internet-related matters.

Joel Moon

Joel Moon represents and advises employers on various labor and employment issues, including various state and federal law claims, wage and hour, discrimination, retaliation, harassment, disability, reasonable accommodations, the interactive process, and wrongful termination. He also provides counseling on employee discipline, separations, terminations, and severance negotiations. In addition, Joel’s practice includes representation of public employers, entities, and agencies. Joel’s focus is on providing employers with preventative measures and counseling, including policy and procedure recommendations. Joel has also lead labor negotiations and negotiated labor agreements for public agencies. In addition to labor negotiations, Joel’s practice also includes advising clients on CalPERS issues and has counseled and worked with employers and CalPERS contracting agencies with respect to CalPERS audit issues related to ongoing compliance and policy decisions. Joel has also litigated and advised clients on civil rights, torts, breach of contract, bankruptcy issues, and issues specific to wage and hour laws, including complex class action and representative actions. Joel has appeared and argued in both state and federal courts and has second chaired a state court civil trial. Joel has experience handling all stages of litigation, from commencement to settlement, trial, or appeal. Joel has extensive law and motion practice in both state and federal courts, including all aspects of discovery, dispositive motions, and pre-trial, trial, and post-trial motions. While in law school, Joel served as the President of the Labor and Employment Law Association. He also served as an extern to Judge Meredith A. Jury of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California. Joel co-authored an article published in the American Bankruptcy Institute Journal entitled, “Hamilton: Supreme Court Drops the First Shoe,” 29 Am. Bankr. Inst. J. 56 (November 2010).

Joseph M. Montes

Joseph Montes serves as the City Attorney for the City of Alhambra, General Counsel to the Successor Agency for the Alhambra Redevelopment Agency, City Attorney for the City of Santa Clarita, General Counsel to the Successor Agency for the Santa Clarita Redevelopment Agency, and Assistant City Attorney for the City of Rosemead. In those capacities, Joseph has provided advice and opinions on issues involving public contracts, privatization, planning, zoning, redevelopment, elections, employment, constitutional rights, conflicts of interest, and telecommunications issues. He has also assisted public entities with issues concerning the Brown Act, the Subdivision Map Act, Mello-Roos Community Facilities District and Improvement Bond Act of 1915 financing, the Government Tort Claims Act, the Public Records Act, Proposition 218, the Political Reform Act, the California Voting Rights Act, and CEQA. He has drafted contracts, resolutions, ordinances, development agreements, and employee policies. Joseph’s litigation experience has primarily involved representation of municipal entities in state and federal court. He has been involved in public works contract disputes, code enforcement, administrative writ proceedings, transient occupancy tax collection actions, Civil Rights abuse cases, police excessive force cases, California Government Tort Claims Act matters, assessment district foreclosures, and flood damage actions. In terms of land use and redevelopment, Joseph’s experience includes acquisition of land through eminent domain proceedings, negotiations for redevelopment projects and drafting of owner participation agreements and development agreements. In law school, Joseph was a staff writer for the Loyola of Los Angeles Entertainment Law Journal (1992-1993) and the Chief Note and Comment Editor (1993-1994), and received an American Juris Prudence Book Award for Trial Advocacy. Joseph ascribes to the philosophy, “Start where you are, use what you have, do what you can.” (Arthur Ashe).

Monica Sanchez McQueen

Monica Sanchez McQueen is a partner in Burke’s Los Angeles office, representing public and private sector clients in labor and employment law matters. Monica has represented and advised employers on matters involving numerous federal and state law claims, including discrimination, harassment, retaliation, wrongful termination, defamation, leaves of absence, whistleblower violations, freedom of speech, and association, privacy, and wage and hour, including collective and class action suits. In addition, Monica’s practice includes representation of public employers in areas unique to public employment such as due process, disciplinary procedures, the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act, CalPERS, and the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act and the Firefighters Procedural Bill of Rights Act. Monica has an extensive counseling practice, focusing on preventive measures of employment and labor law. In this regard, she has drafted and revised employee handbooks, personnel rules, personnel ordinances, updated specific policies and advised public agencies on the handling of a variety of employment matters. Monica has developed and led comprehensive wage and hour audits analyzing City-wide practices of a broad range of job positions and industries and recommended changes to policies, procedures and collective bargaining agreements to ensure compliance with all aspects of state and federal wage and hour laws. Monica has evaluated and responded to CalPERS’ comprehensive pension audit findings of City-wide compensation and reporting practices and developed and implemented policies and procedures to ensure future compliance with CalPERS' rules and regulations. Monica has represented public agencies in all aspects of labor and has identified issues to bargain, recommended, drafted and responded to proposals, advised lead negotiators and members of bargaining teams, has acted as negotiator for police, fire and miscellaneous unions during labor negotiations, and drafted and oversaw implementation of labor agreements. In addition to labor negotiations, Monica has extensive experience in handling related labor relations matters, such as grievances, PERB proceedings including unfair practices, unit recognition, unit modification, elections, and unit decertification. Monica has negotiated and drafted employment contracts for high-level employees. She also conducts a variety of workplace trainings for managers and employees on matters such as the prevention of discrimination and harassment, workplace violence and working in the public sector. While attending the University of California, Los Angeles, Monica interned at the United States Department of Education, in the Office of the Secretary, in Washington D.C. While in law school, she was a member of the San Diego Law Review. She was also the secretary for Phi Delta Phi, a legal honor fraternity, and the Secretary for the Hispanic National Bar Association, Law Student Division. Monica studied at the University of San Diego Institute of International and Comparative Law in Barcelona, Spain and Oxford, England.

John E. McOsker

John McOsker has been a complex business litigator since he joined the State Bar of California in 1993. Throughout his career he has served in various roles for the firms with which he was affiliated including managing partner, litigation group chair, business litigation subcommittee chair and management advisory board. Upon graduation from law school and admission to the bar, John’s practice has been focused on business litigation in the healthcare, retail, environmental/mass tort, manufacturing, insurance, and aviation sectors. Specifically, John has successfully litigated partnership disputes, directors and officers/fiduciary duty claims, mass tort/environmental matters, insurance coverage, insurance bad faith, and accounting fraud, among others. John has defended companies in various forms of administrative hearings, investigations, agency enforcement actions, and adversarial proceedings, including the Federal Aviation Administration, the Small Business Administration, the United States Department of Labor, the National Labor Relations Board, the California Attorney General, and the Equal Employment Opportunities Commission, as well as in state and federal courts across the state and country. In addition, John expanded his practice to include advising companies on matters of regulatory compliance at the federal, state and local level. John continues to advise companies in a wide range of industries as to their business operations as well as defending complex business litigation. John’s entire legal career has been spent in and around Los Angeles and he has volunteered his time and expertise to the local community. He was appointed by Mayor James K. Hahn to serve on the Harbor Area Planning Commission and did so from 2001-2006. He served as the Commission’s President from 2002-2006. In addition to his service on the Area Planning Commission, he was appointed to membership on the Port Community Advisory Committee. He has volunteered as a member of the Board of Managers of the San Pedro Peninsula YMCA since 2005 and has been a legal volunteer for the St. Lawrence Brindisi/Watts Youth Center since 1995. John is a founding Board Member of LA Fleet Week, a non-profit established to annually host the United States Navy for fleet activities in the Los Angeles Harbor beginning 2016.

Stephen A. McEwen

Stephen A. McEwen joined Burke in 2003. Stephen currently serves as the Assistant City Attorney for the cities of Hemet and Atascadero. He previously served as City Attorney for Buellton and Laguna Woods and Assistant City Attorney for Stanton. In these roles, Stephen has drafted numerous ordinances and resolutions and has advised cities on a wide range of legal issues with a special emphasis on the Public Records Act, the Brown Act, and code enforcement. Stephen has also utilized his extensive constitutional law background to advise municipal clients on First Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment issues. Stephen is responsible for supervising code enforcement efforts for Burke’s municipal clients. In this capacity, he utilizes the full range of code enforcement tools, including informal office conferences, inspection warrants, administrative hearings, civil nuisance actions, and misdemeanor prosecutions. Although his emphasis in this area is on resolving code violations without the need for judicial intervention, he has successfully prosecuted numerous code enforcement cases to completion. Stephen obtained a guilty verdict from a jury on all counts against a property owner for maintaining multiple building code and property maintenance violations. He obtained guilty verdicts against two defendants for operating an unpermitted nightclub. He has also obtained preliminary and permanent injunctions in multiple code enforcement matters involving zoning violations, public nuisance conditions, and unpermitted marijuana facilities. In addition to his code enforcement prosecution experience, Stephen has handled a broad array of litigation for the firm's municipal and governmental clients, including disputes involving eminent domain, inverse condemnation, tort liability, construction defects, construction contract disputes, CEQA, and the Federal Civil Rights Act. He served as co-counsel in a successful bench trial regarding a client's right to take property through eminent domain. Stephen successfully defended the City of East Palo Alto in a trial involving alleged Brown Act and Due Process violations. Stephen advises municipal clients throughout the state on issues related to medicinal and adult-use marijuana. He has obtained numerous preliminary injunctions against unpermitted dispensaries and successfully defended cities against an array of constitutional and state law challenges brought by dispensary operators. In 2012, he authored the League of California Cities’ amicus brief in City of Riverside v. Inland Empire Patients Health and Wellness Center, Inc., in which the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that local governments have zoning authority to prohibit medicinal marijuana dispensaries within their boundaries. As a result of this work, Stephen was appointed in 2014 to the League of California Cities Ad Hoc Cannabis Regulation Committee. He also served two terms as the City Attorney Department representative for the League’s Public Safety Policy Committee from 2014-2015. After law school graduation, Stephen clerked for Judge Arthur L. Alarcon on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. He later served as a Deputy Attorney General in the Criminal Division of the California Department of Justice. As a prosecutor, Stephen represented the state in two successful trial-level prosecutions, over seventy felony criminal appeals in the California Court of Appeal, and over eighty habeas corpus proceedings in federal district court and the Ninth Circuit. In November 2002, he represented the California Department of Corrections successfully in an evidentiary hearing in Federal District Court in a case involving allegations of prosecutorial misconduct against the Los Angeles County District Attorney's Office.

Nancy Jerian Marr

Nancy Marr brings a national perspective to her ERISA and insurance litigation practice. Serving as in-house counsel for a Fortune 500 insurance company on the East Coast, she handled cases across several circuits. She previously practiced with a boutique litigation firm in Los Angeles. Her current focus is in litigation involving life, health and disability coverage, ERISA fiduciary liability, annuity contracts, and bad faith actions. While in law school, Nancy was a judicial extern for Hon. Dickran Tevrizian, United States District Court, Central District of California, and a note and comment editor for the Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Journal. Words of wisdom from a senior partner before a first court appearance, “Remember who your client is and know your way to the courthouse.”

Daniel W. Maguire

Dan Maguire is a partner in Burke’s Palm Desert office. He counsels life, health, and disability insurers in pre-litigation, coverage, trial, and appellate matters. Dan represents our clients in individual and group disability, life, long-term care and investment product disputes. He is a frequent speaker on insurance and ERISA matters, and has given presentations at numerous national conferences including the Defense Research Institute, ALI/ABA, American Conference Institute, International Disability Insurance Society, Association of Life Insurance Counsel, and Eastern Claims Conference, for which he acts as Vice-President. He is Past Chair of the Health and Disability Insurance Law Committee of ABA-TIPS. His pro bono work has included client representation through Los Angeles Public Counsel, and the Public Service Law Corporation. Dan is also a licensed California Real Estate Broker.

Michele R. Vadon

Michele Vadon has practiced law in California for over thirty years and has been with the firm since 1980. Michele previously served as the City Attorney for the cities of Industry (1998-2015), Dana Point (1997-2002), Lomita (1994-1999), and Bellflower (1995-1997). Additionally, she has served the City of Costa Mesa as Special Counsel on litigation matters. Michele advises City Councils, Commissions, and Governing Boards of public agencies on legal requirements including matters relating to the Brown Act, Conflict of Interest Laws (Fair Political Practices Act), Public Records Act, land use, planning, and zoning matters, as well as environmental matters. Michele drafts opinions, ordinances, resolutions, agreements, and contracts. She has negotiated and drafted development agreements. Michele is also a senior litigator with over thirty years of experience representing public entities, public officers, and employees in a variety of civil actions in both state and federal court. Michele has served as a Judge Pro Tem in Orange County for a number of years. She is a current member of the City Attorneys Association of Los Angeles County. In addition to her legal work, Michele has been a guest lecturer on municipal liability for the Masters in Public Administration Program at California State University, Long Beach. She also conducts seminars on municipal liability issues at the request of various municipalities.

Eric S. Vail

Eric S. Vail, a Partner of Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP, is Chair of the firm’s robust Public Law Practice Group and serves on the firm’s Management Committee. During his twenty-five plus years practicing public law, he has gained invaluable experience representing a variety of public entities as either general or special counsel, and become fluent in general municipal law; problem solving, conflicts of interest and public transparency, land use, public transactions, transition issues and joint powers authorities. Currently, Eric serves as City Attorney for the City of Hemet and the City of Cathedral City and as General Counsel to SunLine Transit Agency. Through the years Eric has also represented a number of other public entities as City Attorney, Assistant City Attorney, or special counsel, including the City of Temple City, Omnitrans, Orange County Development Authority, City of Moreno Valley, Riverside Redevelopment Agency, the Housing Authority for the County of San Bernardino, the Goleta Redevelopment Agency, Riverside County Education Foundation, and Housing Partners I, Inc., Hemet Community Land Trust , Port Hueneme Redevelopment Agency, City of Lawndale, City of Elk Grove, City of Banning, City of Lake Forest, City of Hesperia, City of Ontario and the Chaffey Joint Union High School District. Offering practical legal solutions to organizational problems are Eric’s hallmark. He has experience with recall elections, term limits and citizen initiatives. He has helped City Councils negotiate and contract with new and outgoing city managers and other department heads, and has helped navigate difficult retirement, discipline and dismissal of employees. In his capacity as City Attorney, Eric has administered legal resources and overseen cost containment and cost avoidance programs for his clients and managed legal staffs of up to 30 legal service providers.

Erica L. Vega

Erica Vega serves as City Attorney for the City of Eastvale, as Assistant City Attorney for the cities of Cathedral City, Hemet, and Wildomar, Assistant Town Attorney for the Town of Yucca Valley, and Assistant General Counsel for SunLine Transit Agency. In these capacities, Erica has developed a broad array of knowledge in the areas of public agency and transportation law. Erica serves as a trusted advisor to clients on a wide array of issues, and provides both legal and practical advice to public agency governing bodies, commissions, and staff. Erica frequently advises on land use and environmental issues related to proposed development projects, including large public and private development projects and public infrastructure improvements. Erica has assisted public agencies navigate the complex web of environmental regulations applicable to development. She has assisted agencies in obtaining permits and approvals from the federal, state and regional environmental regulatory agencies, and advised on the application and interpretation of Habitat Conservation Plans. Erica routinely advises public agencies on CEQA/NEPA compliance throughout the project processing and approval process. She has reviewed CEQA/NEPA documents for and advised on freeway interchange improvements and major state highway projects, General and Specific Plans, large commercial and mixed use developments, university campus expansions, hospitals, and a master planned development proposing over 1,000 new homes. Erica also advises cities on the emerging area of cannabis regulation and taxation. She has drafted ordinances establishing cannabis business regulatory programs and taxes, working collaboratively with city staff, law enforcement, and stakeholders in the process. She advises city staff throughout the business licensing and land use permitting processes. She keeps abreast of the evolving laws and regulations to keep clients apprised of the current law. Erica trains local government officials on conflicts of interest, the Public Records Act, and the Brown Act. These trainings range from basic overviews of the subject laws to customized trainings to address the particular needs of the client. She also serves on the League of California Cities' Public Records Act committee and contributes to the League's guide to the Public Records Act, "The People's Business," and the Municipal Law Handbook. A graduate of Smith College, Erica majored in Government. She also studied in Geneva, Switzerland, where she was enrolled at the University of Geneva and the Graduate Institute for International Studies, and interned at the Center for International Environmental Law. Erica obtained her Juris Doctorate from the University of California, Hastings. At UC Hastings, Erica focused her studies on public law and policy. She participated in the school's Center for State and Local Government Law and Public Law Research Institute.

Jack P. Lipton, Ph.D.

Jack P. Lipton is a Senior Partner as is Chair of our Education Law Practice Group. His practice encompasses a wide range of areas, particularly involving public and private schools and colleges. Jack Lipton has experience in collective bargaining, special education, school facilities, governance, student discipline, human resources, the Brown Act, accreditation, licensing, financial aid, construction, real property transactions, interpretation of the Education Code and Title 5 of the California Code of Regulations, contract review, and other legal issues affecting educational institutions, and he has handled cases in both state and federal courts as well as with the Public Employment Relations Board, the Bureau for Private Post-Secondary Education, the Department of Fair Employment and Housing, and the Equal Employment Opportunity Employment Commission. Jack, who has a Ph.D. in Psychology, has a special interest in the field of psychology-and-law. Jack also has extensive litigation experience, and he has handled writs and appeals before the California Court of Appeal, the California Supreme Court, and the U.S. Court of Appeals. Jack has served on the Editorial Board for the Journal of College and University Law, published by the National Association of College and University Attorneys. In 1988, Jack received his J.D. degree, summa cum laude, from the University of Arizona College of Law, where he served as Articles Editor of the Arizona Law Review and graduated in the top 4% of his class. After law school, Jack served as a Law Clerk to the late Hon. Thomas Tang at the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. A member of the California Bar since 1989, Jack is admitted to practice in the Northern, Eastern, and Central Districts of the U.S. District Court in California, as well as before the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Jack received a B.A. degree in Psychology, cum laude, from U.C.L.A. He earned a Master’s degree in Social Psychology from California State University, Northridge, and his Master’s thesis concerned psychological aspects of eyewitness testimony. Jack received a Ph.D. in Psychology from the University of California, Riverside; Jack’s doctoral dissertation, sponsored by the U.S. Justice Department, dealt with juries. Jack Lipton is Principal Bassist and a member of the Board of Directors of the Los Angeles Lawyers’ Philharmonic Orchestra. Prior to becoming an attorney, Jack had a career as an academic psychologist and taught at Humboldt State University, Union College in Schenectady, N.Y., University of Arizona, and Arizona State University. Also, before earning his Ph.D., Jack taught at Chaffey College, Fullerton College, and San Bernardino Valley College. Jack has been an adjunct professor at the Graduate School of Education and Psychology at Pepperdine University, and at Southwestern University School of Law, where he teaches Education Law. Jack Lipton has served as a Mediator and an Arbitrator, and he was Foreperson of the Grand Jury for the Central District of California. Jack has served as Chair of the Committee on Legal Issues of the American Psychological Association (“APA”) where he was involved with amicus briefs on behalf of the APA. Though currently inactive, Jack is licensed or certified to practice psychology in California, Arizona, and New York. As a psychologist, Jack has served as a consultant in both the public and private sectors, and he has regularly testified as an expert witness. Jack is widely published and has given lectures and presentations in forums throughout the United States and abroad such as at universities and professional conferences. Jack also provides legal assistance to psychologists and other mental health professionals.

Martin Kosla

Martin Kosla primarily practices in the areas of real estate, business and public law. Martin has handled numerous judicial foreclosure matters for public entities concerning delinquent special taxes and assessments, including assisting clients with complex workouts, and taking judicial foreclosure cases to trial. He also has experience in handling real estate transactions, including preparing agreements related to the purchase, sale, and lease of real estate. He has experience is drafting various agreements concerning real property, including purchase and sale agreement, easements and deeds of trust, as well as affordable housing agreements. (Martin is also licensed as a real estate broker in California.) He has also handled a broad range of business litigation cases ranging from defending companies for breach of contract arising out of the supply of goods and services to representing officers of private companies in disputes between their members. Martin has experience in transactional work, including preparing documents associated with the formation of California corporations and limited liability companies. He also has experience in handling trademark matters for private and public clients. Martin has experience in defending government entities against alleged breaches of constitutional rights, including claims under the Fourth and Eighth Amendments. Prior to relocating to California, Martin practiced for four years as an attorney in Melbourne, Australia, where he specialized in all aspects of business litigation. During this time, Martin also handled various real estate and transactional matters for individual and corporate clients. Before becoming an attorney, Martin served as a forward observer in the Royal Australian Artillery.

Keiko J. Kojima

Keiko Kojima's practice includes a broad range of litigation matters, including insurance coverage disputes, bad faith liability actions, and contractual disputes. Keiko's primary focus is in the area of ERISA and employee benefits, including the representation of insurers in life, health, and disability litigation. She also provides litigation assistance to the firm's Education Law Practice Group. While attending Brown University, Keiko interned for former Congressman Esteban E. Torres in Washington D.C. She was also selected to participate in the Everett Public Service Internship Program to work as a summer intern for Citizens for Tax Justice in Washington D.C. While in law school, she received an American Jurisprudence Award in Evidence.

Michelle Marchetta Kenyon

Michelle Kenyon provides legal representation for cities and other public agencies as city attorney and special counsel. Michelle currently serves as City Attorney for the cities of Rohnert Park, Calistoga, Piedmont and Pacifica, Town Attorney for the Town of Moraga, and Special Counsel to several cities in the Bay Area. She previously has served as Acting/Interim City Attorney for many cities including the City of Redwood City, Daly City, Pleasant Hill, and the Town of Danville. Her practice includes advising city councils and staff in all areas of municipal law issues such as annexation procedures, bidding and claims procedures, CEQA, code enforcement, conflicts of interest laws, contract review, elections, Government Tort Claims Act, initiatives, referenda, land use and planning, municipal finance, open meeting laws, personnel, Proposition 218, and water supply assessments. Michelle’s other areas of specialty include land use litigation and appellate advocacy. She is experienced in both state and federal trial and appellate courts, including written appearances in the U.S. Supreme Court. She has successfully served as lead attorney in litigation involving CEQA, inverse condemnation, election law, civil rights, Proposition 218 and rent control, with several outcomes garnering published decisions.

Stephen E. Velyvis

Steve Velyvis is a well-respected land use and environmental law attorney with over 18 years of expertise advising and representing public agency and private clients in administrative proceedings and before state and federal trial and appellate courts. Steve has extensive advisory and litigation experience with and works daily on projects addressing complex legal issues spanning the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Federal Power Act, and the California Coastal Act, as well as the state and federal legal and regulatory frameworks governing clean water, clean air, endangered species and electricity generation and transmission. He also routinely represents clients in land use-related matters including local and state planning and zoning laws, the Subdivision Map Act, timber harvests/timberland conversions, and vineyard expansions. While Steve has extensive advisory and litigation experience with a multitude of environmental laws, he is most experienced with CEQA, having represented parties on all three “sides” of the CEQA equation. In other words, in addition to successfully representing Burke’s many municipal and public agency clients, Steve has also successfully represented numerous private clients (e.g., project applicants and project opponents.) In this regard, Steve distinguishes himself as a leading CEQA practitioner. Steve’s deep and varied experience gives him invaluable insight into what all three sides on a given CEQA project are thinking at every step along the way. This unique perspective also enables him to develop cutting-edge legal strategies aimed at resolving conflicts and prevailing in litigation, as opposed to simply posturing or falling back on routine "cookie cutter" advice and litigation tools. In sum, Steve draws on his collective experience to help Burke’s clients think outside the box and routinely provides successful, cost-effective results.

John J. Welsh

John Welsh is Burke, Williams & Sorensen's Managing Partner and Chairperson of the Management Committee. He has served in these positions since 1996 and is responsible for the firm’s management strategy and financial performance. John is a regular presenter and commentator at continuing education law forums and law practice management conferences. When not serving in the above roles, John provides corporate expertise to the firm's private business and not-for-profit clients. Specifically, John serves as corporate counsel to numerous companies and has negotiated and drafted all of the following documents: supply agreements, distribution agreements, joint venture agreements, franchise agreements, employee confidentiality agreements, leases, sale and purchase of assets and stock agreements, covenants not to compete, partnership agreements, articles of incorporation, bylaws, and SEC filings. Additionally, John has corporate litigation experience involving discovery, law and motion, and trial work involving each of the following causes of action: breach of contract, intentional interference with prospective economic advantage, fraud, trade secrets, negligence, and infliction of emotional distress. John's education law experience encompasses a wide variety of institutional and student-related legal issues including, but not limited to, due process rights in disciplinary and tenure matters, sexual harassment, minority-based admissions and scholarship programs, reasonable accommodations for disabled students, student waivers, inappropriate discipline of students by faculty, right to privacy and public records access, duty of care of institution and its employees, free speech and assembly rights, plagiarism, student assault and battery, revocation and withholding of diplomas, campus crime disclosure, drug testing, accreditation and certification, open meeting laws, and institutional liability for employee negligence.

Nora E.B. Wetzel

Nora Wetzel is a commercial litigation attorney in Burke’s San Francisco office with a focus in commercial real estate and data privacy matters. Nora handles real estate litigation involving purchase and sale, leaseholds, land-use litigation, and eminent domain, as well as general commercial matters. She advises clients regarding their compliance with U.S. federal and state privacy and information laws, data security, breach responses and state and federal security breach notification laws. Nora provides prompt and efficient legal service to healthcare entities and related businesses, educational institutions, public entities, retailers, commercial landlords and tenants, business owners, property owners, developers and public utilities on litigation matters involving commercial real estate disputes, cybersecurity and privacy, eminent domain actions, breach of contract claims and product defect claims. Nora has jury trial and mediation experience, as well as regulatory compliance experience in connection with state attorneys general and the Office for Civil Rights of the Department of Health and Human Services. Nora has been designated as a Certified Information Privacy Professional, United States (CIPP/US) by the International Association of Privacy Professionals (IAPP).

Mitchell A. Wrosch

Mitchell represents employers in all aspects of employment litigation, including wage and hour class and representative actions, and single and multi-plaintiff leave of absence, discrimination, harassment and retaliation claims. Mitchell has represented clients in a variety of industries, including retail, healthcare, security and insurance. Mitchell brings a diverse litigation background to his practice. In addition to employment disputes, he has represented insurers in ERISA litigation and he has extensive experience litigating federal civil rights claims on behalf of government agencies. Mitchell has litigated cases from inception to trial. He is an effective negotiator and has obtained numerous favorable settlements for his clients. Mitchell has co-chaired several federal jury trials and has obtained defense verdicts in each one.

H. James Wulfsberg

H. James Wulfsberg is a nationally recognized expert in construction law. He has over 35 years’ experience in all phases of the construction process, including design-bid-build, design-build, engineering procurement construction contracting, construction management, CM at Risk and public works projects. He has assisted Project Owners, EPC Contractors, Contractors, Architects and Engineers, Program and Construction Managers, and Developers in finding procurement and claims evaluation methodologies, developing procurement documents, negotiating and drafting contracts, negotiating and administering contract claims, and developing claims avoidance and dispute resolution strategies and procedures. Jim has represented clients in mediation, arbitration, and litigation. He has represented EPC contractors, public and private owners, architects and engineers, in a variety of major private, public works, and power process projects throughout the United States, Latin America, Europe, and the Middle East. Jim has tried numerous cases to verdict in arbitration, court and jury trials with claims in excess of $500 million.

Gail E. Kavanagh

Gail Kavanagh’s commercial litigation practice includes real estate title and contract disputes; eminent domain; commercial landlord-tenant matters; commercial tort actions; employment contract, discrimination and harassment actions; and trademark, copyright and trade secrets protection.

Deborah L. Kartiganer

Deborah L. Kartiganer is a partner in the firm’s San Francisco office. A member of the firm’s Real Estate & Business Law Practice Group, Debbie focuses her practice on development and entitlements work and land use law. Debbie’s areas of expertise include: the land use administrative approval process; development of retail, housing, and office projects; public/private partnerships; compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), including the preparation of negative declarations and environmental impact reports; historic resources; compliance with the Subdivision Map Act and the Coastal Act; and the disposition and development of property formerly under the jurisdiction of California’s now-dissolved redevelopment agencies. Debbie’s clients include large corporations, retailers, governmental entities, startup companies, health care corporations, nonprofit organizations, and individuals.

Cheryl L. Johnson-Hartwell

Cheryl Johnson-Hartwell has successfully litigated over 700 disputes to conclusion. She regularly obtains favorable results in federal and state court, with arbitration panels, and before federal and state administrative agencies. She also counsels employers on matters involving hiring, discipline and termination, and workplace policies. Her clients include large-format retail, security services, entertainment, manufacturing, furniture retail, and public-sector employers. Cheryl also represents companies in commercial litigation involving breach of contract, misappropriation of trade secrets, and other disputes. This experience includes defending statutory claims filed under state and federal debt collection practices statutes. Cheryl also has experience in civil rights litigation. She has developed a special niche defending public and private entities relating to alleged barriers to accessibility for members of the disabled community. Cheryl also advises clients on commercial contractual relationships and intellectual property matters. As part of this work, she prosecutes and defends trademark applications with the United States Patent and Trademark Office, advises entertainment industry clients on the branding and packaging of their products, and protecting the intellectual property capital those products have obtained. Cheryl provides clients with proactive strategies to manage litigation risk. She endeavors to obtain an early and cost-effective resolution for disputes and typically resolves them at or before the summary judgment phase. In those cases that proceed further, she has a record of obtaining favorable results for her clients.

J. Todd Wulfsberg

J. Todd Wulfsberg practices in the area of construction and general litigation. While a law student, Todd assisted on matters ranging from residential works of improvement to multi-million dollar commercial construction projects. Since becoming an attorney, his practice has focused on construction and general civil litigation, as well as drafting design and construction contracts for cities, counties, and other public entities throughout Northern California. His work has included the prosecution and representation of multi-national design-build contractors, local public entities, private businesses, and individual owners throughout Northern and Southern California on a wide variety of contract-related matters and disputes. He has provided legal counsel and assistance to numerous public and private clients during all stages of construction, including drafting front end contract documents, assisting with bidding, bid disputes, bidder selection, and award, contract enforcement and change order management, claims handling, pre-litigation claims assessment, early dispute resolution, mediation, arbitration, and litigation. His litigation and arbitration experience includes drafting of initial and responsive pleadings, pre-trial discovery, taking and defending percipient and expert witness depositions, law and motion and ex parte practice, mediation, arbitration, summary judgment and other dispositive motions, pre-trial preparation and trial, and post-trial motion practice and appeals, in both state and federal courts throughout California. Before attending law school, Todd was a top sales associate for Citrix Online, a successful division of Citrix Systems. He was instrumental in developing the inside sales division of Citrix Online’s direct sales group, now one of the largest sales divisions at Citrix Online.

Thomas D. Jex

Thomas Jex is a partner with the firm and serves as the City Attorney for the City of Wildomar, Town Attorney for the Town of Yucca Valley, and provides special counsel services for the Jurupa Unified School District. Tom focuses his practice in the areas of municipal law, local zoning and land use issues, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and the Subdivision Map Act. He frequently represents city councils and planning commissions at their meetings and regularly advises public agencies and staff on a wide variety of municipal law areas, including the Brown Act, conflicts of interest under the Political Reform Act, the Public Records Act, contracts, land use, the Mitigation Fee Act, constitutional issues, and general plan updates. Tom drafts opinions, ordinances, and resolutions as well as other development related agreements. Tom also has experience providing advice to both public and private clients regarding compliance with CEQA and other environmental regulations. Working with many public agencies, Tom deals with CEQA compliance issues almost on a daily basis. He reviews Environmental Impact Reports, Statements of Overriding Considerations, Mitigated Negative Declarations, and Negative Declarations for legal adequacy, and counsels clients to ensure CEQA documents and notices are properly prepared. He routinely advises clients on CEQA compliance strategies including CEQA exemptions, the appropriate level of CEQA review along with related risk assessments, responses to comments on CEQA documents, and the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB32). Tom has drafted local CEQA Guidelines for several public agencies and provides counsel regarding compliance with the Multi-Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) for public entities within Riverside County. Tom augments his practice by serving as a member of the Brown Act Committee of the League of California Cities - City Attorney's Department. He is an adjunct professor for the University of California Riverside Extension where he teaches courses on the Public Records Act and Redevelopment Law. He also frequently lectures for Lorman Educational Services on CEQA and land use issues. Additionally, Tom creates time to provide pro bono legal services and was named the volunteer lawyer of the year for the Inland Empire Latino Lawyers Association for his volunteer work. Tom was an executive editor of the Journal of Public Law and a student member of the A. Sherman Christensen American Inn of Court I while attending J. Reuben Clark Law School at Brigham Young University. Tom lived for two years in Quito, Ecuador and is proficient in Spanish.

David J. Hyndman

David Hyndman practices primarily in the area of commercial litigation, with a focus on construction disputes and related matters. He represents public and private entity clients in a variety of projects, including EPC contracting, construction management, public works projects, and other complex construction matters. His experience includes evaluating and resolving claims and disputes involving water processing plants, power plants, roadways, schools, hospitals, tunnels, and airports, among other issues. David also represents clients in commercial disputes and general litigation matters. During the course of his career, he has represented clients in jury trials, arbitrations, and mediations. David is admitted to practice in both California and Wisconsin. David also has significant experience in implementing efficient and effective procedures for managing pretrial discovery in complex cases. This has frequently included managing document intensive e-discovery and electronic database issues, including implementing cost effective protocols for the review and production of millions of paper and electronic documents, as required by and in compliance with current and evolving Federal and State rules.

Chad W. Herrington

Chad Herrington provides legal representation for cities, counties, and other public agencies. He currently serves as the Assistant City Attorney for the City of Eastvale and Assistant General Counsel for the Tahoe Transportation District, and provides general counsel services to numerous other cities and agencies throughout California. His practice involves advising public agencies in all areas of municipal law including the public records act, open meeting laws, conflicts of interest laws, contracting issues, procurement, code enforcement, CEQA, and land use and zoning. Chad enjoys working closely with elected officials, commissioners, and staff to provide legal solutions and practical advice on a wide range of issues. Chad's other area of specialty includes municipal law litigation, with a focus on eminent domain, inverse condemnation, contract and property disputes, and tort claims. His litigation experience includes the successful representation of public entity clients at all stages of litigation, including trials and appeals. Chad is passionate about public law and has been working with public entities his entire career. Prior to joining Burke, Williams & Sorensen in 2012, Chad served as a graduate law clerk and attorney in the Alameda County Counsel's Office, and worked for a private firm representing school districts and community college districts in a variety of transactional and litigation matters.

Neil F. Yeager

Neil Yeager has developed an extensive and diverse practice in the areas of business, finance, commercial, and real property law where he has gained expertise over the course of more than forty years of legal practice. His practice involves both private and public clients of the firm. He has represented client interests in a broad range of complex business, finance, and commercial matters, including contract negotiation, personal property secured transactions, securities law, municipal bond law, equipment leasing, and commercial loan transactions. He also has in-depth experience in a full array of real property transactions involving commercial and industrial leasing, ground leasing, real property acquisition and sale transactions, real property finance, construction lending, options, easements and licenses, and landlord and tenant representation. During the course of his career, Neil was continuously involved in advising Unified Grocers, Inc., one of the country's largest retailer-owned grocery wholesalers. He represented this client in acquisition and leasing transactions relating to retail supermarket locations throughout California and the west, including both the acquisition and leasing of existing locations and the construction and leasing of new locations. Neil had lead responsibility over the years in representing this client in the bulk acquisition and disposition of numerous supermarket locations which became available through divestitures connected with chain store mergers. Neil has also represented many other grocery and non-grocery industry clients in acquisition and leasing transactions, including stock and asset purchases and sales, facilities leases, and general business and contract matters. Neil's depth of experience has made him a valuable resource to the firm's many public entity clients. He serves as real property counsel to the firm's public clients regarding matters such as the acquisition of property for municipal facilities, parks and open space, and the leasing or other disposition of property for commercial development. Neil has also had extensive involvement in a variety of public finance matters involving the firm’s clients, including the issuance of municipal bonds.

John R. Yeh

John Yeh has been practicing law in California since 1991. A product and consumer of California K-12 public schools, he specializes in representing and advising school districts in charter school, labor and employment, and litigation matters. John is one of the State’s most experienced advocates before trial courts and courts of appeal on charter school and school district matters, having achieved the following results for Burke’s school district clients:

Dismissal of charter school legal challenge to revocation of its charter (Butte County Superior Court Case No. 156847);
Successful defense of challenge to school district award of meal service contract (San Francisco Superior Court Case No. CPF-12-512681);
Summary Adjudication in favor of City against charter school's attempt to exempt itself from local zoning requirements (Santa Clara County Superior Court Case No. 1-13-CV-255504);
Successful challenge to county board of education’s attempt to grant exemption from local zoning to countywide charter school (San Jose Unified School District v. Santa Clara County Office of Education et al. (2017) 7 Cal.App.5th 967);
Favorable ruling from court of appeal involving eligibility for unemployment insurance (California Court of Appeal, First District, Case Nos. A142858 and A143428) (petition for review granted);
Successful judgment after trial in nuisance action against charter school operating in violation of local zoning ordinances (Santa Clara County Superior Court Case No. 1-13-CV-255504);
Demurrer sustained without leave to amend as to Petition for Writ of Mandate regarding salary schedule issue (Santa Clara County Superior Court Case No. 16-CV-297270);
Favorable court of appeal decision addressing material revision requirement for additional charter school sites (Today’s Fresh Start Charter School v. Inglewood Unified School District (2018) 20 Cal.App.5th 276).

In the area of charter school law, John has extensive experience advising school boards on the granting, denial, oversight, monitoring and revocation of charters. John’s experience includes the following:

Representation of several large urban and rural unified school districts, as well as smaller K-8 districts, on how to deal with charter school issues.
Advising school boards on a number of high-profile charter revocations, as well as on the review of charter petitions, having reviewed approximately 200 charter petitions on behalf of school districts.
Advising school districts on best practices in charter school oversight, proposed charter school legislation and charter school funding

John also practices in the areas of personnel and employment law, with a focus on school district personnel issues and labor relations. He has also compiled a successful record representing school districts in arbitration hearings and unfair practice claims before PERB. John has also been certified as an Interest Based Bargaining trainer, and speaks frequently before industry associations on charter school and school district personnel legal issues.

Brian I. Hamblet

Brian Hamblet is a partner at Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP with over 15 years of litigation experience. His interest in defending public entities began in 1995 while he was a law clerk at a firm defending the cities of Beverly Hills and Ventura. Since then, Brian has developed a strong background defending governmental entities and their employees in tort litigation, particularly premises liability, dangerous condition of public property, wrongful death, constitutional law, and civil rights litigation. He has also successfully litigated and tried cases to verdict for both public agencies and private clients in the areas of bodily injury, contract disputes, employment discrimination, products liability, motor vehicle warranty, toxic tort, and unfair business practices, as well as bankruptcy, preference and fraudulent transfer litigation. Brian also serves as the City Prosecutor for numerous cities including Rosemead, Camarillo, and Santa Clarita where he successfully handles criminal litigation and prosecution of code enforcement matters. Serving in these capacities has given Brian a broad range of litigation experience which he continues to expand upon to successfully represent his clients. Brian received his B.A. in philosophy with a minor in business administration from UCLA in 1987. He graduated magna cum laude from Loyola Law School, in 2000 where he was ranked number one in his division and received numerous honors including the Order of the Coif, the Sayre MacNeil Scholars Award, the Dean's Scholarship for Academic Excellence, the American Jurisprudence Award for Excellence in Ethical Lawyering, and First Honors Awards in 1st Amendment Law, as well as Initiative and Referendum Law. Brian was also appointed a member of the Order of the Coif, the St. Thomas More Law Honor Society, and Alpha Sigma Nu Honor Society and was an Editor on the Loyola Law Review. Brian has also lectured extensively for the City Attorneys Association of Los Angeles County (“CAALAC”) as well as the University of Southern California, Loyola Law School, and Mount Saint Mary's College. Prior to becoming an attorney, Brian was an apprentice editor on the movie, Father of the Bride II.

Stephanie Gutierrez

Stephanie Gutierrez is an associate attorney at the Riverside office of Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP and is a member of the Public Law Practice Group. Stephanie advises cities and other public agencies on a variety of public law issues related to the Brown Act, the Public Records Act, the Political Reform Act, and code enforcement. Stephanie regularly drafts contracts, ordinances, and resolutions as well as other development related agreements. She also routinely represents city planning commissions at their meetings and provides training to local government officials. In addition, Stephanie contributes to the League of California Cities’ Municipal Law Handbook. Stephanie earned her Juris Doctor degree from University of La Verne College of Law. During law school, she served as a judicial extern for Associate Justice Carol D. Codrington of the Fourth District Court of Appeal, and was Editor in Chief of the Journal of Law Business and Ethics. She also received a Master of Public Administration degree from University of La Verne College of Business and Public Management. Stephanie has received a lot of advice throughout her legal journey by her mentors, but has received the best from her family: "In between goals is a thing called life that has to be lived and enjoyed."

Laurie N. Gustafson

Laurie Gustafson is an accomplished commercial real estate attorney with more than 25 years of experience. Laurie focuses her practice on complex real estate, finance and construction transactions. She assists clients, both private and public, with the acquisition and disposition of commercial real property, due diligence, financing, leasing, design and construction, development and management. She handles a wide range of projects including offices, corporate campuses, retail, restaurant, shopping centers, multi-family, industrial, rural, infrastructure and mixed use. Laurie has also represented numerous cities throughout California as special real estate counsel on real property acquisitions, dispositions and leasing. She has also assisted cities with the negotiation, documentation and closing on affordable housing projects. Laurie served as the Law Clerk to Chief Justice Edmond W. Burke of the Alaska Supreme Court from 1984-1985.

Samantha W. Zutler

Samantha Zutler is the City Attorney of Healdsburg, a lively community in Northern California. As City Attorney, Samantha advises the City on a wide range of general municipal law issues, including the Brown Act, conflicts of interest, and public records requests. She has also litigated writs challenging public records responses, constitutional challenges to land use decisions, and contractual issues. Samantha also advises regarding general land use matters, CEQA, and constitutional issues. Samantha also maintains a specialty practice in labor and employment. She regularly defends claims of discrimination and harassment, wage and hour claims, and claims of wrongful discharge. She works with clients at all stages of the disciplinary process, from drafting and implementing new policies to defending employers in disciplinary appeals. Samantha has represented public and private sector clients in individual, collective, and class actions, and has extensive experience in litigating employment discrimination claims. Her clients include the City of Oakland, the City of Petaluma, the County of San Bernardino, and the City of Carmel. Samantha also conducts and advises on personnel and internal affairs investigations. She has conducted multiple investigations into matters involving sworn and non-sworn employees, and worked with a team of attorney investigators to complete a confidential internal affairs investigation into the officer-involved shooting of Oscar Grant at the Fruitvale BART station. Samantha is frequently called upon to conduct training for employees, managers and elected officials throughout California on a variety of topics, including ethics for public officials, Brown Act, prevention of sexual harassment, and best management practices. Her experience ranges from conducting individual, one-on-one remedial trainings to group trainings for over two hundred employees. Her audiences have included engineers, maintenance workers, police officers, firefighters, attorneys, mid-level and senior management employees, human resources personnel, Boards of Directors, City Councils, and the most difficult audience possible – lawyers.

Brian S. Ginter

Brian Ginter is experienced in all phases of civil litigation from pre-lawsuit settlement negotiations and pre-judgment provisional relief through trial and appeal. He has obtained favorable results for clients at all stages of their dispute, including temporary restraining orders, writs of attachment, summary judgment, and verdict. Brian’s practice is concentrated in the areas of business litigation, employment law, and professional liability. Having had the benefit of working in litigation firms since he was admitted to the bar, and before that as a paralegal and law clerk, he is able to prosecute and defend a wide variety of cases, which have included allegations of fraud, mass tort, unfair competition, and breach of contract. Recently, he second-chaired a trial involving a breach of contract claim by a harbor terminal company against a defaulting tenant. The case also involved allegations by the defendant that the terminal company breached the contract and damaged the defendant’s oil trading business by approximately $30 million. After a bench trial, the defendant agreed to settle the case by paying the firm’s client over $5 million. Brian’s employment law experience involves claims of discrimination, harassment, retaliation, and wrongful termination. He is frequently called upon to assist clients in difficult and sensitive cases of whistleblower retaliation or fraud and other criminal activity. Brian represented the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Commission in matters arising out of wide-ranging public corruption. The cases included claims against event promoters that paid more than $2 million to a person who was then employed by the Coliseum Commission. After approximately six years of litigation, which included a successful appeal to the California Court of Appeal and a parallel criminal prosecution, the defendants agreed to pay the Coliseum Commission $3.5 million. Other recent work includes representation of a public entity in defense of race discrimination allegations. The case resulted in a unanimous defense verdict after a two-week trial. In the professional liability arena, Brian has successfully represented lawyers, architects, and engineers involving claims of breach of contract, malpractice, conflicts of interest, breach of fiduciary duty, and fraud. He has also litigated claims against these professionals as well as accountants when the professional’s service has caused injury to the client. Away from the office, Brian enjoys staying active in competitive sports. He is an avid baseball player. Along with his wife, he also races with the Vintage Auto Racing Association and other vintage auto racing organizations.

Algeria R. Ford

Algeria Ford is a member of the Public Law, Labor and Employment, and Education practice groups. Al’s practice includes civil rights and tort litigation, code enforcement and marijuana litigation, advising and representing employers on discipline issues and during grievance procedures, drafting ordinances, and providing general advice to department heads, elected officials, and private employers. Al also serves as special counsel for the Hesperia Unified School District, the Val Verde Unified School District, and Fritts Ford Riverside. Prior to joining the firm, Al represented public sector clients while employed with the San Bernardino Office of County Counsel as a member of both the litigation and employment groups. As a member of the Office’s litigation group he defended County departments and employees in numerous state and federal court cases. In that capacity Al obtained successful results on various motions and as counsel in jury trials. As a member of the Office’s employment group, he served as primary employment counsel for the County’s Sheriff Department, assisted in drafting policies and rules, regularly advised on POBR issues, Internal Affairs Investigations and employment disputes, and represented the County before the Civil Service Commission and during labor negotiations. In addition, Al advised the Sheriff Department during federal investigations. An experienced litigator, Al previously worked as a Deputy District Attorney with the Orange County District Attorney’s Office, where he prosecuted multiple cases to jury verdict. Prior to that he worked for the Louisville Metro Public Defender’s Office, obtaining successful results for clients at hearings and jury trial. During law School, Al was the Editor-in-Chief of two of the school’s three legal journals, was a member of the Moot Court Board, and served on the school’s National Trial and National Environmental Moot Court Teams. In addition, he won the School’s prestigious oral advocacy competition during his second year of law school and received honors for obtaining the highest grade in Advanced Constitutional Law, Advanced Trial Practice, and Criminal Procedure.

Nira F. Doherty

Nira Doherty is an experienced city attorney, litigator, and land use expert. Her litigation and transactional practices emphasize general municipal law, land use and development, CEQA, and code enforcement issues. She serves as the Interim City Attorney for the city of South Lake Tahoe, General Counsel for the Tahoe Transportation District, and Assistant City Attorney for the cities of St. Helena and Pacifica. Nira advises city councils and staff in all areas of municipal law including complex land use, zoning, and development matters, open meeting laws, the Public Records Act, conflicts of interest, CEQA, elections, initiatives, contracts and torts, and conflicts of interest. She also advises municipal clients throughout the state on issues related to cannabis. Nira has spoken extensively on cannabis issues and has successfully represented municipalities in cannabis-related litigation. Nira has successfully served as lead attorney in litigation involving CEQA, general plan updates, inverse condemnation, contract disputes, health and safety receiverships, code enforcement matters, tort claims, and cannabis lawsuits. Nira graduated from UC Davis School of Law where she was a member of the UC Davis Law Review and Editor-in-Chief of the UC Davis Environmental Law and Policy Journal. Nira externed for the former Chief Judge Vaughn Walker of the U.S. District Court, Northern District of California and clerked for Judge Steven Bernard of the Colorado Court of Appeals.

Kara L. DiBiasio

Kara DiBiasio handles all aspects of real estate litigation, including commercial and retail CC&R disputes, development agreements, and other breach of contract claims, purchase and sale, leaseholds, and eminent domain. Kara’s practice also encompasses commercial matters, including partnership and contract disputes. Kara has represented Fortune 500 companies, business owners, property owners, retailers, public utilities, private individuals, landlords and tenants in matters involving shopping centers, mixed use projects, industrial properties, and master plan communities. Kara has resolved cases for her clients through jury trials, motion practice, and settlement including mediation. Kara has extensive case-handling experience in all aspects of litigation, including pre-lawsuit counseling, initial investigation, managing discovery, handling large document productions, taking depositions, and motion practice. Kara earned her J.D. from UC Davis, where she was a member of the Moot Court Board and winner of the 43rd Annual Neumiller Moot Court Competition. Kara graduated as a member of the Order of the Barristers for excellence in oral advocacy. During law school, Kara interned at the California Department of Justice in the Office of the Attorney General working in the Appeals, Writs and Trials division. Kara earned her B.A. from California State University, Chico, where she studied political science and graduated summa cum laude. While studying at Chico State, Kara worked in a legal clinic, where she provided legal assistance to tenants and landlords in matters including habitability issues and unlawful detainers.

Sheila Delshad

Sheila Delshad represents clients in various labor and employment law matters. Her counseling practice focuses on discrimination, harassment, retaliation, wage and hour claims, independent contractor issues, employment contracts, due process, medical leaves and disability accommodation and public pension and health benefits. Sheila also has extensive experience counseling and assisting clients with internal reviews and revisions of employment policies and procedures, as well as conducting neutral investigations of workplace complaints. Sheila has served as lead labor negotiator for multiple collective bargaining agreements and continually advises employers on an array of labor relations matters such as the meet and confer process, grievances, discipline, layoffs, reorganizations and contracting out. Sheila’s litigation practice includes considerable work defending public agencies against class action claims of worker misclassification and discrimination. She has defended and counseled employers in matters involving both state and federal law, such as equal employment opportunity under Title VII, the Family and Medical Leave Act, the Americans with Disability Act, the Fair Labor Standards Act, the California Family Rights Act, the California Pregnancy Disability Leave Act and the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act. While attending University of Southern California Law School, Sheila represented indigent clients with USC’s Immigration Law Clinic and with Bet Tzedek Legal Services. Sheila has also served as an extern to the United States Attorney's Office and as a law clerk to the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California.

Timothy L. Davis

Timothy Davis is a partner in Burke, Williams & Sorensen's Silicon Valley office and is Chair of the firm's Labor and Employment Law practice group. Tim has tried to verdict employment cases in both federal and state court, and has conducted over 70 employment arbitrations. Tim routinely defends employers in litigation matters in actions involving state and federal law, such as Title VII, the California Fair Employment and Housing Act, Americans with Disability Act, Age Discrimination and Employment Act, Family and Medical Leave Act, California Family Rights Act, California Pregnancy Disability Act, Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights, and wage and hour issues, including wage and hour class actions. He has represented employers in claims of wrongful termination, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of loyalty, unlawful interference with prospective economic advantage, unfair competition, and constitutional rights violations. His practice also includes the representation of employers before state, federal, and local administrative proceedings, including the Department of Labor, local civil service commissions, PERB, EEOC, and OSHA. Tim's reported decisions include Alhambra Police Officers Association v. City of Alhambra, (2003) 113 Cal.App.4th, 413. Tim also represents both public and private employers as a lead negotiator during collective bargaining with their employee groups, including police, fire, general employees, and management groups. Additionally, his practice includes internal investigations of employment complaints involving discrimination and harassment, as well as the presentation of seminars on how to prevent discrimination and harassment and investigate allegations of discrimination and harassment. He also trains human resources professionals and managers regarding proper investigation techniques. His practice includes development of personnel rules and policies including discipline and grievance procedures, and the investigation of grievances. He advises management clients on labor and employment law compliance matters. He has also served as legal advisor during grievance proceedings. Tim's commitment and experience in public law began in law school, where he co-authored the article, "Does a Public Law Attorney Owe a Duty to Third Parties?" which appeared in the Summer 1994 issue of the Public Law Journal.

Donald M. Davis

Don Davis has provided contract city attorney and general counsel services to public agencies throughout California for over 25 years. He currently serves as the City Attorney for Rolling Hills Estates, Assistant City Attorney for the City of Camarillo, General Counsel for the Friant Water Authority, and General Counsel for the Bear Valley Community Services District. Don also provides special counsel services for numerous other Burke public entity clients. Don has considerable expertise in land use and planning having advised numerous planning commissions and city councils throughout his legal career. He regularly consults with city planning staffs on matters ranging from General Plan amendments to use permits. Don has drafted dozens of major zoning and land use ordinances. His land use practice emphasizes the regulation of matters that implicate federal and state rights of freedom of speech and expression such as signage, adult businesses, protests, and solicitation. Don enjoys governance issues and has extensive experience in the preparation and amendment of various governance documents such as joint exercise of powers agreements, joint powers authority bylaws, and memorandums of understanding between multiple agencies. Don is an authority on the Brown Act, Public Records Act, and other government transparency and ethics laws and is the firm’s principal instructor for AB 1234 ethics trainings. He has provided seminars around the state on these subjects, which have been attended by hundreds of public officials and staff members. He is the principal author of the Brown Act Compliance Manual and the Public Records Act Compliance Manual for the California Special Districts Association. Don is an advocate for the use of plain language in governmental documents and his writing seminars on the topic are popular with local government associations and agencies. Don regularly handles a broad range of real estate transactional matters for public agencies such as property acquisitions, financing, leasing, and dispositions. As part of such transactions, he provides advice on appraisals, title reports, legal descriptions, engineering, and survey issues. In the course of his practice, Don has assisted public and private clients in the purchase or sale of thousands of acres of property valued in the hundreds of millions of dollars. Don has drafted a variety of easement, license, and encroachment agreements with respect to both public and private uses and projects. Don has also worked on solar energy projects, including power purchase agreements. Don has significant experience with a wide variety of environmental issues including CEQA and NEPA. In working with the firm’s public and private clients, Don has handled all aspects of the CEQA/NEPA compliance process, including the hiring and management of project specialists in various environmental disciplines. He routinely provides advice and opinions on CEQA/NEPA compliance strategies, and has reviewed and commented on numerous CEQA/NEPA documents ranging from notices of preparation to mitigated negative declarations and environmental impact reports. Don is proficient in negotiating, drafting, and reviewing contacts for public agencies, including contracts for public works projects, maintenance, goods and services, consultants and professional services. Don is a strong proponent of plain language in public contracts, which should be readable and understandable to public agency staff and the general public – not just lawyers. Don regularly provides advice on a range of public finance matters such as Proposition 218 and 26, the adoption and adjustment of public fees, rates and charges (including sewer, water and solid waste rates), and has advised clients on the formation and oversight of assessment districts, community facilities districts, and other special financing mechanisms. As a litigator, Don has successfully defended public agencies in matters involving due process, equal protection, freedom of speech, government torts, inverse condemnation, public bidding and contract disputes, and writs of mandamus including CEQA suits. Don also has represented private clients in real estate, contract, and business-related litigation. Prior to becoming an attorney, Don served as a United States Peace Corps Volunteer in Yemen and also worked as an international educational consultant.

J. David Darroch

A partner with Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP, David Darroch practices in the area of construction disputes, litigation and alternative dispute resolution. For the past 20 years, David has focused his practice primarily in the specialized field of construction law, construction litigation and construction-related issues. He represents public and private entities in the area of power engineering, infrastructure, transportation, wastewater, and industrial process engineering. David has extensive expertise counseling owners, construction firms, designers, contractors, subcontractors and suppliers regarding construction change management and project disputes. He has experience assisting clients with dispute resolution boards, mediations, and other informal dispute resolution methods and has extensive experience in prosecuting and defending claims and trying cases to verdict, including jury trials, court trials, arbitrations and appeals in construction matters large and small. David is admitted to practice in the State and Federal courts of California, and has been admitted pro hac vice in various other jurisdictions in the United States.

Douglas W. Dal Cielo

Douglas Dal Cielo specializes in general business litigation and family law. Areas of expertise include real estate, business torts, employment litigation, and corporate disputes. He possesses significant trial experience, including eight jury trials and over 15 court trials. Doug’s last two jury trials resulted in verdicts for his clients in excess of $12 million and $2 million on behalf of plaintiffs. He has taken over 300 depositions, and served as a court appointed arbitrator and mediator. Recent accomplishments include the settlement of a $5 million shareholder dispute on behalf of the minority shareholder, a $3.2 million wrongful termination and fraud claim on behalf of the plaintiffs, a $1.6 million mechanic’s lien foreclosure action on behalf of the claimant contractor, and a $12 million jury verdict on behalf of a plaintiff in an elder abuse claim in Santa Clara County.

Deirdre Joan Cox

For over twenty years, Deirdre Joan Cox has practiced in the construction and public contracting field. Joan's practice involves representing public agencies in complex construction matters, including strategizing development and procurement approaches, drafting construction documents, including performance and payment bonds and parent guarantees, advising clients during the course of construction, claims review and analysis, and claims resolution, including mediation, arbitration, and litigation. She assists in the resolution of issues that occur at the intersections between funding, design, acquisition, and construction. She serves as special counsel to a number of local agencies and general counsel for the Olivehurst Public Utility District. She has extensive litigation experience in state and federal court. Her efforts, from a project’s early stages through trial and beyond, allow public agencies to deliver public projects on time and on budget. Her experience includes multi-million dollar projects for cities, counties, and other municipalities, including hospitals, community college, school and special districts, and other commercial facilities in myriad bond funded projects, individual projects, and capital improvement programs. She has particular experience in lease revenue bond financing, Mello-Roos bonds, public private partnerships, and other financing mechanisms. Joan has extensive experience working with public entity clients to develop construction project manuals: “front-end” construction documents for all types of public works projects using delivery methods that involve competitive bidding utilizing lowest responsive, responsible bidding and “best value” concepts for traditional hard bid / design-bid-build, design-build, construction manager at risk, and lease-leaseback delivery mechanisms. She also drafts contracts for architects, engineers and other professionals. Her work includes preparing the project documentation including drafting, negotiation, structuring of delivery and procurement approaches and risk evaluation. She also assists public entity clients in administering the bidding process and facilitating the defense and handling of bid protests, subcontractor listing, project setup, and related issues that arise during the bidding / proposal process including attending hearings and assisting in preparing findings and conclusions. Joan also has experience in inverse condemnation and California land use, development and CEQA law, having represented both private and public entities in connection with flood control disputes, water rights, and environmental impact review/mitigated negative declaration issues. Joan received her J.D. with honors from Golden Gate University School of Law. She served as a Settlement Commissioner for the Alameda County Superior Court, a fee arbitrator and a private mediator. She taught contract law at East Bay Law School for ten years. She has also taught Public Finance and Law & Economics at Golden Gate University. Joan currently serves as Mayor of the City of Sausalito.

Melissa M. Cowan

Melissa M. Cowan represents and advises insurers, third-party administrators, and employee benefit plans in first-party insurance matters at both national and local levels. For decades, she has actively litigated disability, accident, life, health, long-term care, and ERISA cases. Her results – including two separate jury verdicts for punitive damages against fraudulent insureds – have contributed to the development of insurance law within the Ninth Circuit. Her practice has expanded into class actions and complex commercial litigation, as well as defense of agents/brokers, religious organizations, and public law clients in general and business litigation. Melissa is passionate about writing and speaking at national and regional forums. She strives for new ways to keep insurance issues practical and thought-provoking. Her special interests include fraud, “bad faith”, ERISA, litigation tactics, legal trends, and claims practices. When not working tirelessly for clients, Melissa enjoys adventures with her family, musical theater, and UCLA Bruins volleyball and basketball. Her views on life and the law are exemplified in the philosophies of the great UCLA Coach John Wooden, who said, “It takes time to create excellence. If it could be done quickly, more people would do it.” In pursuit of excellence, “It is the little details that are vital. Little things make big things happen.”

Timothy Alan Colvig

Timothy A. Colvig is recognized as an expert in the fields of insurance, environmental, and construction law. He has over 30 years of legal experience litigating and resolving disputes in a broad range of disciplines, including real estate, landlord-tenant, business transactions, unfair competition, corporate, and employment law matters.

Susan E. Coleman

Susan Coleman is a Partner at Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP with 24 years litigation experience and a strong background in constitutional law/civil rights litigation and employment law. Susan has defended individuals and officials, governmental entities and corporations in over 45 civil jury trials in federal and state courts throughout California, with very successful results (over 95% defense verdicts). Susan is an associate of the American Board of Trial Advocates (ABOTA). Susan worked for the Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General, for over 13 years. Since going to private practice, Susan has represented various entities such as the cities of Alhambra, Burbank, Hemet, Long Beach, Los Angeles, Modesto, Newport Beach, Pasadena, Simi Valley, Stockton and Riverside; the county of San Bernardino; the GEO Group; Management & Training Corporation; Alcohol Monitoring Systems Inc., the Bureau of Prisons, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, and those entities’ individual employees and executives. Susan also has extensive experience with class action litigation, including several class actions on behalf of the Department of Corrections, and she represented the Board of Parole Hearings in a lengthy bench trial involving the Americans with Disabilities Act (Armstrong v. Davis). In the last few years, Susan has defeated class certification in cases for various clients. Susan has specialties in certain unique areas of law including officer-involved shootings and other uses of force, alleged wrongful conviction cases and ankle-monitor related litigation (for companies such as AMS, B.I. Inc., and LCA Inc.). She also conducts personnel investigations as needed for clients. Susan has consistently taken measures to ensure excellent representation of her clients in a cost-effective manner. For example, she recommends LVN review and summary of medical records (providing a medical expertise at a fraction of attorney billing rates); she keeps brief banks on common areas of law in order to avoid re-inventing the wheel for each case; and she takes every effort to eliminate defendants and/or claims from the case at the earliest opportunity, prevailing on many cases at the motion to dismiss or demurrer stage. While many cases cannot be defeated at the initial motion stage, Susan has had excellent results in prevailing in summary judgment and at trial. She is also in favor of, and actively pursues, measures to decrease future litigation, such as pursuing the award and recovery of costs after prevailing, having plaintiffs declared as vexatious litigants where appropriate, or seeking recovery of fees and costs under FRCP 41(d) for prior lawsuits when there are successive similar lawsuits. During law school, Susan served as Articles Editor for the Santa Clara Law Review. In addition, she held a clerkship for the California Court of Appeal, Fourth District for Justice J. Smith. After obtaining her J.D., Susan attended San Francisco State University’s Master’s in Tax program from 1994-1996, completing all but thesis.

J. Leah Castella

Leah Castella is a partner in Burke’s Oakland office. She received her J.D. with Honors from the University of Texas, Austin in 1999 and her B.A. in Philosophy from Lewis & Clark College in 1995. As a seasoned public law lawyer, Leah has extensive knowledge and experience advising public agencies on public accountability and governance issues. She is familiar with the full range of laws affecting California public agencies, including the Brown Act, the Public Records Act, the Political Reform Act, Proposition 218, and the Public Trust Doctrine, and she currently serves as the General Counsel of Ironhouse Sanitary District and the Assistant General Counsel of Union Sanitary District and the Vallejo Flood & Wastewater District. Leah is also an experienced litigator, and over the last nineteen years, she has handled dozens of cases in state and federal court on behalf of public and private clients. Her area of litigation expertise includes Proposition 218, land use, real estate, municipal finance issues, and public trust. Leah has an exemplary track record of favorably resolving cases at the demurrer and summary judgment stage, but when disputes cannot be resolved by motion, she is also a successful trial advocate. She has tried cases in state and federal court and conducted evidentiary hearings in front of legislative bodies on a wide range of issues, including tax allocation, bypass requirements, and ordinance compliance. She is an experienced appellate advocate, and has successfully argued over a dozen cases in the California Court of Appeals involving myriad issues, including the public trust doctrine, California’s Anti-SLAPP statute, attorney’s fees, the Medicaid Act, Proposition 218, the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), Inverse Condemnation, and redevelopment dissolution disputes. Leah has particular expertise in advising clients on rate setting, taxation, and election issues, including compliance with Propositions 218 and 26. She successfully beat back a claim that a City’s water connection rates were too high in Canon Manor v. City of Rohnert Park. And she has advised cities and special districts on compliance with the California Voting Rights Act, preparation of ballot titles and summaries for proposed initiatives, and the procedural requirements for general and special elections.

Fabio R. Cabezas

Fabio R. Cabezas consistently brings an advocate’s skill, common sense judgment, and high energy to his practice. He takes pride in being a litigation attorney. He has taken matters from their start through trial and appeal. He has represented clients throughout California in the areas of real estate, business, insurance, intellectual property, and employment litigation for over twenty-five years. He has litigated cases in state and federal courts throughout California. He has argued cases before Appellate Courts in California and has litigated cases in Bankruptcy Courts in California.

Christina M. Burrows

Christina Burrows is an associate attorney in the Public Law Practice Group and provides advisory and litigation services to cities and other public agencies. Christina’s practice focuses on a variety of public law and land use issues, including the environmental law, elections, open meetings, public records, contracts, tort liability, and code enforcement. Christina serves as counsel to planning commissions and assists public agency staff in processing land use applications. In addition, Christina represents cities and other public agencies in breach of contract, tort, and code enforcement lawsuits.

Megan A. Burke

Megan A. Burke provides municipal law services to public agencies throughout California. She currently serves as the Assistant City Attorney for the Town of Tiburon and as the Assistant Counsel for the Eastern Contra Costa Transit District. Megan specializes in revenue issues, such as the adoption and defense of rates, fees, and taxes in compliance with Propositions 13, 218 and 26 and the Mitigation Fee Act. For example, she has assisted local agencies with the establishment and increase of rates for water, sewer and solid waste services and the adoption and management of various impact fees. Megan has also defended multiple lawsuits challenging the legality of rates and impact fees under the California Constitution and state law. In addition, Megan provides special counsel litigation and advisory services on a wide range of public law matters, including the Bradley-Burns local sales tax law, eminent domain, inverse condemnation, local land use and zoning issues, general municipal law, the California Public Records Act, and conflicts of interest. Megan is currently prosecuting several actions on behalf of cities and successor agencies against the Department of Finance, which challenge adverse determinations related to the dissolution of redevelopment agencies.

Joseph P. Buchman

Joseph Buchman maintains a diverse litigation and transactional practice, acts as general counsel to Montebello Land & Water Co., a mutual benefit non-profit water company, and as counsel to the Los Angeles Unified School District School Construction Bond Citizens' Oversight Committee.

Joseph has extensive background in public, corporate, business, and real estate matters, acquired from years of experience representing and advising clients in bankruptcy matters, eminent domain, real estate and title litigation, purchase and sale transactions, financing transactions, probate and estate planning, tort litigation, collection actions, contract disputes, and election litigation.

Thomas B. Brown

Thomas Brown has been with Burke since 2010. He served for eight years as the City Attorney for the City of St. Helena, and 12 years as the City Attorney for the City of Napa, prior to which he served as Senior Deputy City Attorney for the City of Berkeley. Tom represents public agency clients. His practice focuses on all aspects of municipal law. He has extensive experience advising clients and litigating in land use, zoning and planning, the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), real property entitlements, police power, charter cities, municipal taxation, Brown Act, Public Records Act, code enforcement, intergovernmental relations, grand juries, elections, initiatives, and referenda. Tom has successfully litigated several cases involving issues under California’s open meetings law, the Brown Act. He has provided training under the Brown Act and the Public Records Act, including for the League of California Cities at its annual New Mayors and Councilmembers orientation meeting each January. Tom was a visiting professor at Sonoma State University where he taught "California Land Use Law." He is a past President of the City Attorneys Department of the League of California Cities.

Randall G. Block

Randall Block represents businesses in commercial, real estate and insurance coverage and bad faith disputes. He has successfully prosecuted and defended a broad range of matters including ownership disputes, eminent domain proceedings, judicial foreclosure actions, commercial landlord-tenant disputes, complex homeowners association claims, general contract and commercial matters, and land-use matters. With more than 30 years of experience resolving real estate and commercial disputes, he seeks to provide his clients efficient and cost-effective solutions by distilling complicated problems into manageable challenges. Randall has appeared in state and federal courts from California to Delaware. His practice includes arbitration, mediation, and the workout of disputes in addition to more traditional litigation.

Susan E. Bloch

Susan Bloch specializes in affordable housing, economic development, and transactional real estate matters. Susan has over 20 years of experience representing private and non-profit developers and public agencies, including cities, counties, housing authorities, and redevelopment successor agencies in transactions involving the acquisition, development, financing, leasing and sale of residential, commercial and industrial properties; and the development and implementation of affordable housing policies and programs. Susan has provided special counsel services on real estate and affordable housing transactions for Alameda County, Placer County, the Santa Clara County Housing Authority, the cities of Oakland, Union City, San Leandro, Mountain View, Morgan Hill, San Carlos, Daly City, South San Francisco, Petaluma, Napa, Pleasanton, Dublin, and Livermore, and other public entities including Los Angeles World Airports (LAWA), the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City of Los Angeles, Sacramento Regional Transit District, East Bay Regional Parks District, the Transportation Agency of Monterey County, and the Moraga-Orinda Fire District. Her nonprofit clients include Veterans Housing Development Corporation, the California Odd Fellows Foundation, and the Hilarita-Tiburon Ecumenical Association. Before beginning her practice as an attorney, Susan served as Program Manager with the Sacramento Housing and Redevelopment Agency and as a consultant to the Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation and the National Economic Development and Law Center. She has been a speaker at conferences and seminars sponsored by the League of California Cities, the California Continuing Education of the Bar (CEB), the Real Property Section of the California State Bar, the California Redevelopment Association, Housing California, the Northern California Association for Non-Profit Housing, California Association for Local Economic Development (CALED), the California Association of Local Housing Finance Agencies (Cal-ALHFA), the Bay Area City Attorneys Association (BACA) and the City Attorneys Association of Los Angeles County (CAALAC). She has served as a member of the Board of Directors of California Association of Local Housing Finance Agencies since 2014.

Michael G. Biddle

Michael brings nearly thirty years of experience to his practice advising public agencies on all matters of municipal law while emphasizing real estate acquisition, site remediation, land use, CEQA, land disposition and development, and redevelopment dissolution. Michael served the City of Emeryville as its City Attorney from 1994 through 2015, after serving as its Assistant City Attorney for the previous five years, and routinely advised elected and appointed officials, City management and staff on a broad range of issues relating to economic redevelopment, hazardous materials remediation, affordable housing, planning and zoning, public contracting, public art, public finance (taxes, impact fees, assessments), governance (Ralph M. Brown Act, Public Records Act, Political Reform Act), and elections. Michael was also responsible for the management of several site remediation projects undertaken by the City and its former Redevelopment Agency, as well as the City’s regulatory Brownfields Program in coordination with the Department of Toxic Substances Control and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Michael is a member of the Post-Redevelopment Task Force organized by the City Attorney’s division of the League of California Cities to provide guidance to cities and successor agencies on redevelopment dissolution matters.

Michael B. Bernacchi

Michael Bernacchi is a trial attorney whose practice is devoted to both commercial litigation and defense of life, health, disability, and property/casualty insurance claims. He has engaged in civil litigation and trials in state and federal courts for over twenty years. He has tried or second-chaired numerous cases to a conclusion. His business litigation experience includes complex business disputes, including actions under Business and Professions Code §17200, and litigation involving Proposition 64. He specializes in defending bad faith and ERISA claims but also has experience in property and casualty cases and environmental coverage disputes, recently successfully litigating several such cases on behalf of Beneficial Fire and Casualty Insurance Company. Mike received his B.A. degree from the University of California, Berkeley, in 1988 (cum laude in political science) and his J.D. degree from Loyola Law School of Los Angeles in 1992. While at Loyola, Mike was a note and comment editor for the Loyola Law Review.

Denise S. Bazzano

Denise Bazzano is a member of Burke’s Public Law Practice Group where she leverages her multi-faceted experience in municipal law and litigation to assist public entities in a variety of legal and regulatory matters. Denise advises city councils and staff on a wide range of both transactional and litigated matters including issues relating to code enforcement, cannabis regulation, criminal prosecution, contracts, land use, public works projects, animal control, purchasing and liability exposure. Her experience also includes reviewing policies, procedures and projects to ensure compliance with state and federal codes, including the California Environmental Quality Act, the Brown Act, the Public Contracting Code and the Public Records Act. Denise also provides training to city councils and staff to ensure compliance with AB 1234 obligations. Denise previously served as a Deputy City Attorney for the City of San Jose, where she managed a complex and diversified caseload covering municipal, construction, environmental, tort, police civil rights, and criminal law.

Daphne M. Anneet

Daphne Anneet is a partner in Burke, Williams & Sorensen’s Los Angeles office. She is Vice-Chair of the firm’s Labor and Employment Practice Group. A skilled litigator, Daphne has achieved excellent results for clients in state and federal court, as well as in arbitrations and administrative proceedings. She represents public and private employers in a wide range of matters including class actions, wrongful termination, discrimination and harassment litigation, wage and hour litigation, pension litigation, contracting out disputes, unfair labor practice disputes, disciplinary appeals, and appellate matters. Daphne has served as lead defense counsel in a number of class action lawsuits over the past decade and has a proven track record of achieving successful results in a variety of creative and cost-effective ways. A graduate of the LA County Bar Association’s Trial Advocacy Project, Daphne has served as a pro bono prosecutor. In addition to her litigation practice, Daphne has served as the Chief labor negotiator for the cities of Alhambra, Corona, Lynwood, Hermosa Beach, and Hemet. She currently provides labor relations services a number of cities, counties and special districts. Since the enactment of AB 646, Daphne has served as an agency advocate for several factfinding proceedings. Daphne serves as General Counsel to the City of Coronado’s Civil Service Commission. As a member of the panel for NAM (National Arbitration and Mediation), Daphne has also served as an arbitrator. Daphne conducts independent investigations of complaints involving discrimination, harassment, retaliation, workplace misconduct, and alleged conflicts of interest. She has also written and lectured on a wide array of employment issues for many organizations at their annual training conferences and conventions, including the Los Angeles County Bar Association (LACBA); Professionals in Human Resources Association (PIHRA); California Public Employers Labor Relations Association (CALPELRA); League of California Cities; Association of California Water Agencies; Southwestern Law School; and, Southern California Public Labor Relations Council. Daphne received her Juris Doctor, magna cum laude, from Southwestern Law School, where she was awarded the Outstanding Woman Legal Graduate award. She also served on Southwestern’s Board of Trustees. Daphne is a committee member of the Labor and Employment Law Section of the LA County Bar Association and an affiliate member of CALPELRA. She is a Past President of the National Association of Women Business Owners, LA Chapter.

Gregory R. Aker

Gregory Aker specializes in the litigation and trial of complex business disputes. During his more than thirty years as an attorney, Greg’s litigation practice has included almost every major area of the law. Greg has represented clients in litigation involving business and commercial contract disputes, bankruptcy and creditors’ rights, violation of state and federal securities laws, unfair competition, the protection of trade secrets, secured transactions and commercial law, real estate transactions and land use disputes, evictions and other landlord/tenant disputes, wrongful termination and employment discrimination. In the area of financial services litigation, Greg has handled cases involving commercial loans, bankruptcy claims, foreclosures, securities processing services, lender liability actions, deposit accounts, checks, wire transfers and other bank operations matters, the interpretation and enforcement of factoring agreements, and intercreditor agreements. Greg has handled major litigation involving a variety of construction projects nationwide, including courthouses, power plants, condominium developments, and hotels. He has represented construction contractors and project owners, as well as architects and engineers, in litigation, arbitration, and mediation.

Carmen M. Aguado

Carmen M. Aguado is a senior associate in Burke, Williams & Sorensen's Los Angeles office. Carmen’s areas of practice include civil rights litigation, labor and employment, and general liability matters. Prior to joining Burke, Carmen represented various public entities and employees in civil matters, including labor and employment cases and civil rights lawsuits on behalf of local law enforcement under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, in state and federal courts. Carmen has substantial experience in all phases of civil litigation, including written and expert discovery, law and motion practice, settlement negotiations, and trial preparation. Additionally, she has successfully argued motions, including motions for summary judgment, in state and federal courts. Carmen earned her J.D. from Loyola Law School, where she was a Production Editor on the Entertainment Law Review and published the article, “Facebook or Facebank?” (32 Loy. L.A. Ent. L. Rev. 187 (2012)). Prior to law school, she earned her undergraduate degree (B.A., Political Science) from Loyola Marymount University, and participated in the selective Hansard Society Scholars program.

Brian M. Affrunti

Brian Affrunti has represented both private companies and public entities in a broad array of complex civil litigation matters. Brian has extensive experience representing clients in litigation in both federal and state courts in disputes involving real estate, employment, business disputes, intellectual property and products liability. During his fifteen year career, Brian has gained significant trial experience, having tried numerous jury cases, court trials and binding arbitrations. Brian also has considerable experience in trial preparation, discovery, and law and motion. Brian was recognized for his achievements in Moot Court while attending the University of California, Hastings.

See All People Results

See Less People Results

Practices ( Results)

Constitutional Law

Tort Claims and Products Liability

Labor Relations

Eminent Domain and Inverse Condemnation

Law Enforcement Defense

Intellectual Property

Financial Institutions and Bankruptcy

Family Law

Real Estate and Business Law

Public Law

Litigation

Employment Law and Litigation

Insurance Coverage and Litigation

Environmental, Land Use, and Natural Resources

Education Law

Construction Law

See All Practices Results

See Less Practices Results

Results ( Results)

Burke Attorneys Prevail on Cutting-Edge SB 35 Case

Jury Returns Verdict for Employer in Race/Age/National Origin Discrimination Claim

Home Health Care Company Prevails In Wrongful Termination Lawsuit

Burke Secures Jury Verdict in Race Discrimination Case

St. Helena Triumphs in Rent Stabilization Measure

Burke Attorneys Prevail on Cutting-Edge CEQA Challenge

Jury Trial Victory in JPA Condemnation Case

Burke Defends Major Corporation from Suit by Injured Employee of Subcontractor

Defense of Bay Area City in Federal Court Action Involving Securities Fraud Claims

County Wins Whistleblower Lawsuit

Burke Assists City Of Santa Clara In Bringing City Place To Life

Emeryville Transit Center Project Leaves The Station

Employee Fired for Selling TVs at an Unauthorized Discount, Not Because of Gender

See All Results

See Less Results Results

Events ( Results)

Deciphering the Education Code: Translating the Law into Sound Personnel Practices for Certificated & Classified Employees

Promoting Student Safety: Child-Abuse Reporting and Safe Personnel Practices for Public School District Personnel

Working With Your Governing Board On All Things Charter

Material Revisions – Best Practices and Procedures

The Role of Board Policies in Charter Authorization and Oversight

2019 California Legislative Update

Got Sites? Preparing for Sixth Cycle Housing Elements

“Houston, Do We Have a Problem?” California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 and Implications for Municipal Governments

Public Contracting 101/Awarding Contracts (Part 2)

4th Amendment and Rights of Entry

Charter School Transparency

Ethical Principles for City Attorneys (Even More Chock full of Ethics)

Housing Legislation Frenzy Continues

Leave It to the Experts: Selecting and Effectively Using (or Challenging) Expert Witnesses

Contract Management and Administration (Part 2)

Navigating Social Media – A Guide for Local Agency Officials

Diversity and Unconscious Bias

Ehrlich Resurrected: Public Art Ordinances Once Again Under Attack

Changing Cultural Norms in the Post-“Me Too” World

A Business Perspective on ERISA Claim Valuation

How Social Should Special Districts Be?

Nollan/Dolan Doctrine: Property Owners’ Attempts to Expand to Legislative Acts, e.g., Adoption of Public Art Ordinances

Legislative Update and RHNA Reform

Nuts and Bolts of Project Approvals

Strategies for Addressing Homelessness and Affordable Housing: Not One Size Fits All

Exactions

Auditing Your MOU

Best Practices Surrounding Social Media Platforms

The Life and AD&D Litigation Update: The 2019 Survival Guide

Exposing LTC Fraud: From Claim Denial to Successful Verdict

WRCOG 28th Annual General Assembly

California Contract Cities Association Annual Municipal Seminar

Quiet Title Actions

Trends in Law Enforcement Litigation

League of CA Cities: City Attorneys’ Conference

Beyond Tolerance: Cultivating an Elevated and Inclusive Workplace

Data Alone is Not CEQA Analysis

Contract Management and Administration (Part 1)

Long-Term Care Insurance Issues and Trends

Facebook vs. the First Amendment

How to Build and Maintain the Public’s Trust: Practical Ethics and the Law (AB 1234)

Introduction to Eminent Domain

Communications and Civic Engagement

Your Legal Powers and Obligations

Planning Commission 101

Salary Schedules: A Deep Dive

Negotiation and Effective Documentation of Disciplinary Issues

Deciphering the Education Code – Translating Law into Sound Bargaining Practices

Choose Your Own Disability Adventure

#NotYouToo: Advanced Harassment Prevention Training For HR Professionals And Managers

Decertification And Representation Petitions: Opportunities To Improve An Agency’s Labor Relations Structure

Technology And Privacy In The Workplace: A Primer For The Public Employer

The CalPERS Audit: Demystifying The Public Agency Review Process

How to Achieve State-of-the-Art Charter Authorizer Status: San Jose Unified’s Authorizer Best Practices

School District Challenges: Charter School Facilities

What You Say Online Can and Will Be Used Against You: Social Media Training for Law Enforcement Agencies

Interpreting and Valuing Easements Under Eminent Domain

Workers Compensation and Various Leave Laws

Golden Nuggets: Balancing the Right to Know vs. Privacy in the Workplace

Eliminating the Confidentiality of Certain Police Records

Getting to Yes – Leveraging State Law to Secure Project Approvals

Resurgence of Rent Control and Tenant Protection Law in California

Avoiding Past Mistakes and Averting Future Pitfalls: The Importance of Disability and Medical Leave Basics

PERB, Court and Legislative Developments Affecting HR

Not Your Average Harassment Training

Beyond the Basics: Advanced Harassment Prevention Training

Don’t be Blinded by the Sun: Social Media in the Public Sector

Race Time Decisions: Choose Your own Discipline Adventure

Green Means Go: Marijuana Update

Charter Renewal Decisions

Charter School Admissions Lotteries: Ensuring Equity & Fairness in the Admissions Process

Getting off to a Good Start: Managing New Hire & Onboarding Risk

Reviewing For Quality: Educational Program

Free Speech, Union Activity and Social Media in the Fire Service

Think Before You Act: Diversity and Unconscious Bias in the Workplace

Life and AD&D Litigation Update: The Good, The Bad, & The Ugly

Rules of Professional Conduct: Almost 70 New Ways to be More Ethical!

Service Animal Training for Businesses Open to the Public

Know Your Laws: Women in the Workplace

Understanding Historical and Tribal Cultural Resource Issues Under CEQA

Mind the Gap: Reconciling Boomers, Gen X, Millennials, and Gen Z in the Workplace

Cultural Changes in the Workplace in the #MeToo Era

Where Are All the Women At?

AB 1234 Education Training

INCYMI: Recent Developments in Social Media and the Law

Getting It Right: New Rules for New Redevelopment

Theft of Trade Secrets Through Departing Employees

Gender Issues in Policing from the Law and Order Perspective

Ballot Box Planning and Finance

California Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) Update

Effectively Mediating Employment Disputes: The Mediator’s Prospective

Avoiding Speed Bumps at the Intersection of Land Use and Real Estate Law

“Green is the New Gold”: An Overview and Update on State and Local Cannabis Legalization and its Implications for Real Property, Land-use, and Business

Demolition in Progress: A Panel Discussion on Breaking Through Barriers to Advancement in Commercial Real Estate Law

The Future of Housing in California: Economic, Policy, and Development Perspectives

The New Norm: Cultural Changes in the #MeToo Era Workplace

Roundtable Discussion: Self-Advocacy, Career Development & Personal Negotiation

Work-Life & Creating Balance: 2.0

Advanced Training in the CA Public Records Act

What You See Depends on Where You Sit

Great! We’ve Been Served! Now What? How Do You As An Agency/Consultant Survive A CEQA Lawsuit

Workplace Investigations: When, Who, How and Why?

California Public Records Act Training

Municipal Elections: From Start to Finish

Establishing Venue in Favorable Jurisdictions

Transparency Strategies

Ethics Training Workshop

Charter School Oversight: The Need for Reform in Charter School Finances and Governance

Utilities takings by Public Agencies—What You Need to Know

Negotiation Hot Topics

CalPERS Requirements, Audits, and Related Bargaining Considerations

Selected Negotiations Fundamentals for the Beginner or the Experienced Bargainer

Negotiating Leaves of Absence

Construction Law 101

How to Document an Employee File

Ready or Not – Top 5 Legal Changes Coming for 2018!

Understanding and Effectively Managing Employee and Union Protected Rights

Understanding Special Compensation: Key Compliance Issues

The CalPERS Audit: How To Successfully Navigate The CalPERS Audit Process

When Charter Oversight Becomes Crisis Management

Private Device Issues Panel Discussion

Think Before You Tweet: Social Media Basics for Local Government Officials

CEQA: An Update

How to Minimize and Avoid Litigation

When the ADA and Eminent Domain Cross Paths: Awareness, Pitfalls, Valuation and Design Issues

Ethical Considerations in the Practice of Eminent Domain

Education is Your Passport to the Future: HR Back to Basics

Abstentions and Disqualifications – Conflicts of Interest and When One Must or Should Step-Aside

Avoiding a Bumpy Landing: Lighting the Approach to an Effective Interactive Process

Smoke on the Horizon: Recreational Marijuana Employment Concerns

Sexual Harassment Prevention Training

New Developments for Industrial Disability Retirements

Preventing Workplace Harassment, Discrimination, and Retaliation for Elected Officials

Effective Internal Workplace Investigations

Charter Schools: Authorizer Challenges

Required Harassment Prevention for Staff/Board

Power of the Pen: How Leaders Create Effective Documentation in the Workplace

Marijuana Update: the Governor’s Trailer Bill and Draft Regulations

The Real World Impacts of State and Local Marijuana Regulations on Marijuana Businesses and Real Estate.

Social Media in the Public Workplace: Friend…Follow…Fire?

Rolling the Dice! Cohabitation Agreements: A Clean Break of a Palimony Lawsuit?

Executive Assistants Workshop

Recent Developments, Defenses and Strategies in Brown Act Litigation

Employment Law Traps in California (and Elsewhere) That Might Surprise You

Ideas and Challenges Related to the Cannabis Industry and Real Property – Financing, Leasing, Selling, Buying, and Permit Compliance

Multi-Parcel Acquisition Programs – Considerations, Expectations & Reservations

Beyond the Basics of Real Estate Litigation – Most Commonly Litigated Landlord-Tenant Issues

Improvements: What Could Possibly Go Wrong?

Ideas and Challenges Related to the Cannabis Industry and Real Property – Financing, Leasing, Selling, Buying, and Permit Compliance

Basics of Land Use Law

No Employee Left Behind: Evaluating the Evaluations

When the Chips are Down: Learning from the HR Headlines

It’s Elementary, Dear Watson: Conducting Effective Workplace Investigations

Attorney’s Fees – Impact on ERISA Litigation

2017 Legal Update for Public Sector Employers

Lock Project Prices in Earlier: Design-Build Alternative to Traditional Procurement

Sanctuary Cities: A Legal Guide

Everything You Never Wanted to Know About Medical Leaves of Absence and Disability

Public Business + Private Account = Public Record: Navigating the California Supreme Court’s Landmark Public Records Act Decision

Power of the Pen: Creating Effective Workplace Documentation

Proposition 64, Adult Use of Marijuana Act

Managing Social Media in the Public Workplace

Officer-Involved Shootings & Body-Worn Cameras

Annual Labor Law Update

ACSA’s Legal Alliance: Hot Topics in Human Resources Today

The ADA and Eminent Domain: Potential Liability of Agencies When They Take Prejudgment Possession; Valuation Considerations; Other Issue

Independent v. Dependent Charters

Everyday Ethics for Supervisors

ERISA Claim Regulation and Statutory Penalties

Proposition 64 and the “Adult Use of Marijuana Act” (AUMA)

Communications and the New Media

The Shifting Total Compensation Paradigm

Preparing and Responding to Union Pressure Tactics

ERISA Administrative Appeals – Problematic Issues

Leveraging Tobacco Control Laws for Marijuana Control

Charter School Legal Issues

Winning Trial Practices: How to Tackle Your Opponent’s Expert Through Cross-Examination

Overview of Special District Laws

Keeping Charter Schools in Check: Enforcing Accountability and Compliance

A Deep Dive into the Public Records Act, 2016 California Special Districts Association

Working in a Fishbowl: Practical Challenges for Public Sector Employees

California Environmental Quality Act: Key Developments Affecting Water Projects

Preventing Workplace Harassment, Discrimination and Retaliation for Supervisory and General Employees

Managing the Virtual Playground: What Every HR Professional Needs to Know About Social Media

Health Insurance Opt-Outs After the Affordable Care Act and Flores v. City of San Gabriel Decision

Essentials of Workplace Investigations

HR in Crisis: Learning from the Headlines

Mental Health, Safety, and Workplace Accommodations: Effective Management of Mental Disabilities in the Workplace

Keeping Score: Creating Effective Documentation in the Workplace

Brown Act Essentials

Preventing Workplace Violence

Dealing with Board Member Conflict of Interest Issues, Legal Symposium for Experienced Board Members

Ethics: Considerations for Your Eminent Domain Practice

Protecting Your Client from Contractor Default: A Toolkit for Transactional Attorneys

Education Insights: Legal Update (Keeping Up with State and Federal Accountability Regulations)

Is It “E-legal”?: The Legal Practicalities and Pitfalls of E-investigation, E-signatures, and E-litigation

Rescission: Attacks and Comebacks

Update on Significant Public Law Cases

Public Records Act Recent Developments

Sunny Days Ahead: Criminal Background Checks

Medical Marijuana: Continuing Regulatory Changes

Labor and Employment Litigation Update

Exploring the Depths of Disability Discrimination

Environmental Law Basics: Understanding CEQA

Navigating Through the Fog of Fit for Duty Evaluations

Escaping the Cyclone: Choose Your Own ADA-FEHA Adventure

Everything You Never Wanted to Know About Employment Law

Valuing Diversity in the Workplace

Diving in the Deep End of Disability Discrimination

AB 1825 Sexual Harassment Prevention for Staff and Elected Officials

The Brown Act

Legal Tools for Nuisance Abatement

Independent Contractor Versus Employee

Litigating Strategies for Filing ERISA Case v. Filing Non ERISA Cases, Procedural Nuances in the Early Stages of Pleadings, Finding More Favorable Venues, and Transfer of Venue

The Perils OF Using Electronic Devices During Board Meetings

Charter School Facilities: Understanding the Proposition 39 Process

Charter Schools: Authorizing Board Responsibilities

Maternity and Pregnancy Legal Rights Program

Authorizers Question Time: Open Forum with a Panel of Experts

HR Boot Camp for Supervisors

Unconscious Bias – Can We Talk?

Fitness for Duty Evaluations

Human Resources Boot Camp

Fiduciary Exception to the Attorney-Client Privilege in ERISA Litigation

Keep Calm and Update Your Status: Emerging Trends in Social Media

Case Studies on Placement of Telecom Facilities in Cities’ Public Rights-of-Way – “Can You Hear Me Now?”

ADA and the Interactive Process: It’s More than it Appears

Open Meeting Remedies

ADA/Interactive Processes, Accommodate What?

Mechanic’s Lien, Sexual Harassment and Licensing Highlights

Total Compensation: What Components Should Be Included

Law and Regulation Updates

Strategies for dealing with ADA Disputes in Commercial Leases

Charter Authorizer Challenges: Facilities, Funding and Authorizer Power

Conducting Totally Tubular Workplace Investigations

Everyday Ethics

Panel Discussion on Transgender Workplace Issues

Social Media: A Guide for Public Officials

Planning Fun-da-mentals

Mechanic’s Liens and Condominiums on the Rise

Takings Law – Recent Developments and Evolving Issues

Medical Marijuana Regulation & Safety Act

CEQA Update

County Offices of Education and Charter Oversight: Responsibilities and Best Practices

Five Reasons Not to Check Your Smartphone During Board Meetings

Sex, Lies & Social Media: A Survival Guide for Board Members

Charter Petition Renewal

Charter Revocation

A Practitioner’s Approach to Implementing the Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act (AB 266, AB 243, and AB 643)

Communications and the New Media

Ensuring a Pupil-Friendly Charter Petition Review Process

Keeping Students Safe: Cyberbullying and Sexual Violence

The Brown Act: The Top 10 Issues Boards Face

Disability Insurance Litigation: Inside, Outside, Upside Down

Social Media: Policies and Best Practices

Navigating Academic Performance Data Requirements on Charter Authorizer Duties

Staff Training Requirements for Bilingual and English as a Second Language (ESL) Classrooms

Board Presidents Workshop: Tools for Strategic Leadership

Preventing Workplace Harassment, Discrimination, Retaliation, and Abusive Conduct

Marijuana Legal Update and Municipal Regulation Webinar

State Housing Programs

Informational Briefing on the Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act

Ethical Considerations in Eminent Domain

Tap Dancing at Club Obi-Wan: Choreographing the Interactive Process

Update on PERB & Court Decisions Affecting Bargaining – The New Developments You Need to Know

Total Compensation in 2015 and Beyond: Practical Tools for Negotiations and Recruitment Efforts

Brave New World: Preserving Client Confidentiality in a High-Tech Environment

Legal Malpractice and Ethics

The Many Lives of a Death Claim

Boundary Issues and Easement Law

Effective Return to Work Programs and the Interactive Process

Difficult Conversations in the Clubhouse: How to Handle Sensitive Human Resources Situations

Don’t Let One Bad Apple Spoil the Bunch: Strategies for Addressing Challenging Employees

Brownfields and Public/Private Partnerships

Joint OCIPLA and LAIPLA Judges Panel

Don’t Let One Bad Apple Spoil the Bunch: Dealing with Difficult Employees

Employment Discrimination 101

Scope of Bargaining

Total Compensation – What Should Be Included Today?

Bargaining Process Options – Can Interest Based Bargaining Improve Things? Is it Time to Return to Positional Bargaining? How do We Decide?

What Should We Share with the Union? Marshaling and Presenting Data Effectively

Impasse, Factfinding and Concerted Activities

Current Developments in CEQA Law and Practice

Salvaging Tiered Water Rates Post San Juan Capistrano

AB 2188 Implementation Requirements for Rooftop Solar Systems

Social Media Challenges and Opportunities for Special Districts: A Legal Perspective

It’s All Fun and Games Until the Flying Monkeys Arrive: Dangerous Workplace Conduct

If I Had Only Used My Brain: Creating Effective Documentation in the Workplace

Best Personnel Practices to Promote Student Safety

Employee Handbook Update 2015

Human Resources Guide to Effective Employee Evaluations

Legislative Update: What’s Happening Now

Using Personnel Investigations to Reduce Risk and Maintain Staff Relations

Employment Law Update

Sex, Lies & Social Media: A Survival Guide for Public Officials

Inclusion Services Under the ADA and Methods for Compliance, a Case by Case Approach

Firefighter’s Procedural Bill of Rights Act: Overview and Solutions for Employers

Update on Post-Redevelopment Legislation and Litigation

Local Public Employee Discipline, Discharge, and Procedure: Avoiding Costly Mistakes

We, the Rude, Angry, and Violent People: Preventing and Responding to Dangerous Workplace Conduct

Reading the Tea Leaves: What the Claims for Professional Liability Coverage Say About Contractors’ Procurement and Claims Handling Procedures

Hot Topics

The Latest Trends, Developments and Challenges in Non-ERISA Claims: An In Depth Look at Continuing and Emerging Topics in IDI and LTD Claims

Employee Compensation: The Shifting Paradigm

Hacking, Threats and Other Cyber-Misconduct

Advocacy in Construction Disputes III: Bad Facts

Legal Alliance Panel

Fulfilling Charter Authorizer Obligations under LCFF and LCAP

Avoiding Wipeouts On The Wave Of Social Media

Moving Your Mooring: Best Practices For Guiding And Defending Your Agency Through Contracting Out Decisions

Going With The Flow: Managing Multiple Bargaining Units To Obtain Optimal Settlements

Explaining Tidal Surges And Shifting Sands: Communicating Effectively With Employees And The Public During Negotiations

Riptide Ahead: Preventing and Responding to Dangerous Workplace Conduct

Keep Calm and Update Your Status: Social Media and Board Members

How to Build a Winning Team for Affordable Housing Development

Preventing Discrimination and Harassment

Sexual Harassment Prevention Training for Elected and Appointed Officials

Legislative Update: AB 2053 Abusive Conduct Training

Evaluating the General Manager

The Troll Under the Bridge: Consequences of Not Addressing Disability Discrimination

Ethical Considerations When Representing the Condemnor

Avoiding Gnarly Wipeouts by Conducting Totally Tubular Workplace Investigations

Trying to End the Endless Summer: Conducting Reasonable Accommodation Meetings

In Order to Form a More Perfect Workplace Investigation

Let’s Be Clear: Plain Language for Local Government

Preventing Workplace Harassment, Discrimination, and Retaliation in the Legal Profession

Don’t Tweet Your Way to Termination: Social Media and the Public Workplace

The Intersection of ERISA and Bad Faith: A Roadmap of the Triumphs, Trials and Trends for 2014 and Beyond

Social Media and Public Employee Discipline

Teacher Tenure and Seniority: What is Their Future After Vergara?

Really Bad, in a Good Way: Performance Evaluations, Employee Discipline, and Effective Documentation

The Dissolution of Redevelopment – Impact on Pending and Planned Acquisitions

The Troll Under the Bridge: Disability Discrimination in the Workplace

CEQA Issues

Ethics Training for Community College Trustees and Administrators

Constructing Strong and Solid Investigations

Benefit Claim Litigation

Killing the Trap Questions in Deposition and in Cross Examination by the Expert Witness

They’re Represented…Now What?!

Best Practices for Effective Workplace Investigations

Reviewing Charter School Petitions in the Era of LCFF

Reinvention 2014-New Approaches to Housing, Redevelopment, and Economic Development

Practical Advice for Minimizing CEQA Liability in Your City

Brown Act: Burlingame – What You Need to Know

California False Claims Act

The California Voting Rights Act

What You Need to Know About Public Records and Open Meetings

Status Update: Recent Developments to Social Media in the Workplace

How Does Cyberspace Affect Your Personnel Practices

Impact Bargaining

The Latest on the Recovery of Attorneys’ Fees in the ERISA and Non-ERISA Context

Eminent Domain From Start to Finish

The Planning Commission’s Role & Responsibility in the EIR Process

Advocacy in Construction Disputes: Litigating Delay and Disruption Claims

How to Strengthen Your Agency: Human Resources Boot Camp for Managers

Lessons Learned from Livermore’s Experience with the Board of Equalization

California Public Records Act and Records Retention Policies

Effectively Communicating Your District’s Choices

Hot Topics and Recent Updates in Intellectual Property Law Including the New Adult-Oriented XXX Domain

Effective Indemnity Provisions in Patent Licensing and Assignments Agreements

See All Events Results

See Less Events Results

Publications ( Results)

Burke Attorneys Prevail on Cutting-Edge SB 35 Case

Summary of Major Changes to Petition Review and Appeal Process and Criteria Under AB 1505

A Business Perspective on ERISA Claim Valuation

Adopting Impact Fees: A Cautionary Tale

Are Deputy Sheriffs Who Provide Courthouse Security Entitles to Eleventh Amendment Immunity in California?

Brown Act: The Importance of Sticking to Your Agenda

Brown Act: Avoiding Violations by Responding to Cease and Desist Letters

Using The “Committee Exception” To Exclude Public Comment At Special Meeting Violates Brown Act

Court of Appeal Affirms School District’s Discretion to Locate Charter Schools Under Proposition 39

Gov. Code Section 65009 Bars Challenge to Agreement Authorizing PG&E to Cut Trees on ROW; Plaintiff Failed to Serve Complaint within 90 Days

Access to Private Entity Records is Not Enough to Compel Disclosure Obligations Under CPRA

ADA Web Accessibility Litigation is on the Rise

Get Ready For 2019: The Year Of Harassment Prevention

2018 Legal Trends

In Case You Missed It: California Adopted Comprehensive National Origin Regulations

An Advanced Look at Senate Bill 1421: Analyzing the Confidentiality of Certain Police Records

Keeping Up with the Legislature: 2019 Brings Changes to the Fair Employment and Housing Act

Court of Appeal Clarifies Statute of Limitations in Police Discipline Matters, Clearing Way for Disciplinary Proceedings in Racist Texting Case

New Law Establishes Several New Protections For Employees Bringing Harassment Claims

Public Employees Can Use Employer E-Mail for Protected Communications During Non-Work Time

(Nearly) Every Minute Counts for Non-Exempt Employees in California Following the State Supreme Court’s Ruling in Troester v. Starbucks

CA Supreme Court Decision is a Change of Course for Zoning

Your Anti-Camping Ordinance May Violate the 8th Amendment

Development Agreements are Meant to be Handled by Local Governing Bodies, not the Initiative Process

State Bar Doesn’t Have to Disclose Racial Data

Understanding Dynamex: The Public Employer Perspective

Aftermath of the Janus v. AFSCME Decision

The Evolution and Application of a CEQA Exemption

Preparing for Changes: California Legislative Update

Chico Unified Board Approves Blue Oak Charter Renewal

Electronic Discovery in Construction Disputes – Pitfalls for the Unwary

Charter Schools Must Obtain Approval of Additional School Sites through a Material Revision, Not Renewal, of their Charter

Three Keys to Preventing Workplace Harassment: Training, Leadership and Accountability

Brown Act Compliance Manual for Special Districts

New Bill Reflects California’s Desire to Change Outdated Workplace Norms

2017 Legal Trends

2018 Brings New Restrictions on Public Employers’ Inquiries Into Salary History and Conviction History

Charter Bill Reveals Potential to Widen Divide with LEA’s

Internal Affairs: Lopsided Time Limits in San Jose Unified’s Charter Debate

Employee Satisfaction Surveys Value & Risks

The Values and Risks of Employee Satisfaction Surveys

Propositions 26 and 218 Implementation Guide

Fiduciary Duty to Monitor Investments: Tibble, Act V Scene II

Land Use: The New Arena in the Struggle between Independence and Accountability for Charter Schools

Inside Celerity Charter School Network, questionable spending and potential conflicts of interest abound

Courts Reject Attempts to Exempt Charter Schools from Local Zoning Requirements

Courts: Only District Can Zone Charter Schools

When it Comes to Lawsuits, Small Businesses Who Snooze Will Lose

Clear as Mud Redux: California Leaves of Absence in the Public Sector

‘Going Forward’ in Bivens Cases: Will the Supreme Court’s Decision in Abassi Narrow the Scope of Claims Against Federal Officials for Monetary Damages?

Plan Must Be Both Established and Maintained By a Church or Its Principal Purpose Organization

Abuse of Discretion Standard ‘Tempered with Skepticism’ Due to Reviewing Physicians’ Financial Conflict of Interest

Ninth Circuit Clarifies Section (c)(1) Penalties Against Plan Administrator

Do Public Entities Need to Retain their Social Media Pursuant to the Public Records Act?

2016 Legal Trends

Preparing for 2017: California Legislative Update

Update on Significant California Public Law Cases

Workplace Harassment Prevention Training is Now Mandatory for Elected Officials

Livermore Charter Schools, School District Battle Over Rumors

School Board Talks ROP

Selling Voters on Local Tax Measures

Fact Sheet: 1,2,3-Trichloropropane and What it Means for Your Water Supply System

Preserving Access While Regulating Conduct in Public Libraries

5 Things Every Non-Patent Attorney Should Know About Recent Changes In Patent Law

Court of Appeal Issues Important Clarification of Summer Unemployment Benefits for School Employees